UPDATED: Ringwood man killed in late-night smash on A31

The scene of the crash on the A31. Pictures: Simon Rowley The scene of the crash on the A31. Pictures: Simon Rowley

A MAN from Ringwood was killed when his car ploughed into the back of a parked lorry near the town in the early hours of yesterday.

The smash caused a long stretch of the westbound A31 to be closed during the morning rush hour and led to traffic chaos around the area.

The crash happened at Poulner Hill at 2.30am and police closed the road from junction two of the M27 up to the Ashley Heath interchange – around 17 miles in total.

The BMW, being driven by a 53-year-old Ringwood man, crashed into the back of the foreign-registered Scania lorry, which was parked in the layby past Burley services.

The driver has not yet been identified.

Eyewitnesses described how parts of the car were left embedded in the lorry, while the BMW itself finished up some way down the road.

Fire crews from Ringwood, Burley and St Mary’s in Southampton were called to the scene and police had to turn around a tail-back of vehicles back to Picket Post.

Both lanes going west were closed until mid-morning, when police managed to reopen one to allow traffic to start to pass the scene.

Roads around the area were heavily congested as drivers took alternative routes and the eastbound carriageway of the A31 slowed due to onlookers.

The road was fully reopened at around 1pm after recovery work was completed.

John Hendy, 65, from Weymouth, was driving his son to Gatwick and went past the crash scene. He said: “It was on the other side of the road and I saw three police cars hurtling past. On the way back to Bournemouth at 6am I got on to the M27 from the M3 and then I was diverted off after Southamp-ton.

“I was diverted off and had to go past Beaulieu and Cadnam.

“There was a stream of traffic but at that time there wasn’t a big build-up of traffic.”

Anyone with information on the crash should contact Hampshire Constabulary’s Roads Policing Unit on 101, quoting Operation Rydale, or the Crimestoppers charity, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.

Comments(37)

Huey says...
2:02pm Tue 16 Oct 12

No - we have a right to see what has caused such a major road to be closed for so long, and also to be told how exactly how the accident happened.
Maybe he fell asleep. Maybe he had a blowout. The cops will tell us in due course.

Huey says...
2:33pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Clarrie wrote:
So Huey would want to know all the details but would you want everyone to know. This is a very private time for the family of the driver and my sincere condolences go out to them. Echo you have let yourselves down with poor advertising and photos, your readers and the family deserve better from you!!!
Road accidents are NOT private events.
It is a public place.
Members of the public will have seen the aftermath as they drove past.
Many others have been affected by the closure of the road.
What is wrong with telling us the story of what has happened?

More Chips says...
2:35pm Tue 16 Oct 12

That is not the car in the photo, its the bottom of the truck. The article says that the car ended up down the road a bit.

MngsMnr says...
2:40pm Tue 16 Oct 12

The Echo has no say over what ads appear on google ads. The ads are determined by what YOU look at. Google assumes that by clicking a link with the word fatal or killing that you might be interested in funerals. Also whatever you've looked at will follow you in future clicks - and those random ads will follow you.
As for this very sad death, showing pictures is no different from the cancer ads on cigarette packets. We become blase about death and a reality wake up call isn't such a bad thing.

CourtOffside says...
2:50pm Tue 16 Oct 12

I don't quite understand why the motorway was closed 15 miles away though?

Dave Mack says...
3:02pm Tue 16 Oct 12

First of all my thoughts go out to the man's family. Secondly I passed this accident heading eastbound at 02:40 this morning and the first two police vehicles had just arrived, the car is not embedded under the rear of the lorry, the tail lights that you can see are the HGV tail lights (or what is left of them) alot of the metal work will be parts of the HGV and some of the BMW front nearside. The BMW actually came to rest in the offside lane further down the road. Driving conditions this morning were awful, gusty winds, a wet road surface and an abnormal amount of leaf coverage on the carraigeway, all of which "could" have played a part in what happened. I drive a relatively heavy, safe car and didn't feel comfortable at more than 60-65 along that stretch of road this morning. As for those of you angered by the photo's, why do you read the Echo?? I work in the transport industry and attend many accidents like these. Sad to say the Echo is only reporting facts, something that a photo cannot lie about and I would rather see a fact rather than "media speculation!" Again my thoughts go to the family . RIP

Piston_Broke says...
3:15pm Tue 16 Oct 12

CourtOffside wrote:
I don't quite understand why the motorway was closed 15 miles away though?
I can answer that one for you. The B3078 Roger Penny Way (the route from M27 Junction1 towards Fordingbridge) is closed for several weeks for roadworks beyond Brook. Therefore, it made sense to prevent traffic reaching the end of the motorway, from where motorists would still have had to head for Lyndhurst, or use the unsuitable New Forest road through Bramshaw, Nomansland and Landford.

TheDistrict says...
3:19pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Sick, sick, is all I can say. How can Huey or anyone turn this tragedy into a debate on what visual information should be placed in this story. Pictures are the true facts yes, and anyone reading the story and seeing the pictures could easily see that what is believed to be the vehicle in question, is not.
.
However, my initial point is this, how can such a story be turned into a debate of what should be and should be not shown.
.
No thought given to the family from both sides in my opinion. Perhaps the Echo could have waited until next of kin had been informed, before publishing the pictures. Any scene such as above would be awful for the family to read or see.
.
Of course the worst people are those who slow down on the opposite side of the road to see what is going on, with the possibility of causing a further accident. Very sick people.
.

Holland82 says...
3:31pm Tue 16 Oct 12

It does clearly say that it is parts of the car and the car ended up further down the road. NOT that its the car under there.

Dave Mack says...
3:47pm Tue 16 Oct 12

TheDistrict, do you travel many miles a year? I doubt it, I did naturally slow down to just over 50mph because of the blue and red flashing lights..... the point of the lights is to make you aware of a hazard. I imagine you drive with your eyes closed? There is no debate, Life (and death) is hard.

doorsett says...
3:48pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Holland82 wrote:
It does clearly say that it is parts of the car and the car ended up further down the road. NOT that its the car under there.
I think you'll find this paragraph was added after the first few comments.

yiyayiya says...
3:49pm Tue 16 Oct 12

If you dont like the way the Echo is reporting this then dont read it DUH!!!!

Not rocket science. I am glad they are giving out as many details as possible

Huey says...
3:51pm Tue 16 Oct 12

yiyayiya wrote:
If you dont like the way the Echo is reporting this then dont read it DUH!!!!

Not rocket science. I am glad they are giving out as many details as possible
Well said.
Go away if you can't handle it.
Let those us of us who ARE interested find out what happened.

yiyayiya says...
4:05pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Further to previous post, it is important to know why this happened. I drove past here at 10.30 last night and visibility / conditions were bad. Is it a case of mechanical failure or was the driver driving too fast for the conditions like 99% of drivers nowdays. Keep up the good work Echo, people want to know what happened.

Dave Mack says...
4:08pm Tue 16 Oct 12

I'm sure most of you are far more educated and older than myself, this is not a debate forum, its a comments forum..... respect the man's family please!

hamworthygirl says...
4:09pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Sad to see this accident RIP this poor man and deepest sympathy to the family.

pauldee007 says...
4:18pm Tue 16 Oct 12

As someone else said... the car is not under the lorry in any of these images... some people see what they want to see rather than what is actually there, the car was removed by the time that first pic was taken. RIP, sad to see...

Piston_Broke says...
4:28pm Tue 16 Oct 12

pauldee007 wrote:
As someone else said... the car is not under the lorry in any of these images... some people see what they want to see rather than what is actually there, the car was removed by the time that first pic was taken. RIP, sad to see...
No it wasn't. The smashed car was 200m down the road, near the blue-light vehicle in the distance in the photo.

psatlast says...
5:24pm Tue 16 Oct 12

I drove home along there just before midnight and I felt that 50 was fast enough.High wind and heavy rain and very difficult to see standing water from your driving position in a car and there were still idiots who thought they were on a racetrack.So,perhaps this vehicle was thrown off line by some standing water--that can happen even at lower speeds if the water is deep enough.

The Renegade Master says...
5:30pm Tue 16 Oct 12

The Echo are here to report facts and these pictures are not in any way gratuitous or disrespectful to the deceased man and his family. What's disrespectful were the idiots who slowed up on the opposite carriageway to gawp at the recovery operation. You should all be ashamed.

Letcommonsenseprevail says...
6:58pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Huey wrote:
doorsett wrote:
I have to disagree, I don't feel we have any rights, surely the written detail is enough, without a photograph. How would you feel if that was a member of your family?
I would want to know ALL the details
Once again, Huey is true to form and displaying all his usual traits. People - don't respond to his comments, they're only posted to get a response. He sits at home, the centre of his own sad little world enjoying the upset he causes others. Sure hope you never get involved in a serious car accident, Huey.

b26b says...
7:43pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Was there not a similar accident further up the A31 involving the tragic death of a recovery lorry driver? Perhaps something needs to be looked in here at laybys so close to a fast road. They need to be segregated from the 1st lane. The spur road is another dodgy one even worse when the camera car is parked in it. With the awful loss of life last night and the miracle that no one was killed in the bus accident on the A350 we may ask the question are our coucils doing enough to ensure road safety on these roads? I know human error plays a part. But surely having a layby so close to traffic doing 70, and lets be honest sometimes faster, is this a good idea? I think Dorset safety partnership and whatever the Hants version is should look inwardly to road design and iron faults as much as they can.Putting up flashing signs and cameras is just papering over the cracks.

Chris the plumber says...
8:24pm Tue 16 Oct 12

It was wet and windy, the car hit the lorry in the rear and still ended up 200M (400m acording to itv news) so it was obviously not doing 50mph, b26b say it is the fault of the road , the council or some other body, modern cars are so reliable and well built that drivers are nealy always to blame for collisions, even the police now do not call them accidents, because with 99% of rtc`s someone is at fault.

News reader says...
8:50am Wed 17 Oct 12

What happened to all the comments from yesterday?

News reader says...
9:50am Wed 17 Oct 12

When I poste the above, the article had no comments showing?????

rudolph_hucker says...
9:53am Wed 17 Oct 12

News reader wrote:
When I poste the above, the article had no comments showing?????
Blame the internet mate

nermal says...
11:46am Wed 17 Oct 12

It says in the article that the lorry was parked in a layby, but in the photo it looks like it's on the main carriageway - am I misunderstanding something?

Leesaclare says...
12:03pm Wed 17 Oct 12

@Nermal, the lorry was parked in a layby, you have to physically leave the carriageway to get into the layby there is a bit of grass inbetween the layby and carriageway ( i live close to here)

Dont drop litter says...
12:24pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Huey wrote:
No - we have a right to see what has caused such a major road to be closed for so long, and also to be told how exactly how the accident happened.
Maybe he fell asleep. Maybe he had a blowout. The cops will tell us in due course.
I hate to see that some people are more interested in the reason they were late for work than in the loss of the poor man's life.
Whenever I am held up in a tail back, I always think that some poor soul didn't make it home to his family that day.
Put things into perspective.
The motorway closure was caused because somebody died....end of story.

corinney says...
12:41pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Hi my name is Corinne and I am the daughter of the man that lost his life in this tragic incident. Firstly I would like to say a big thank you for everyones support and kind comments. I quite agree with the comment made above- people shouldnt worry about being late for work, its nothing compared to losing someone you loved so dearly.

doodle19 says...
2:51pm Wed 17 Oct 12

we would like to send our deepest sympathy to you and your family, our brother had a very similar crash back in 07, although he was very badly injured we are very lucky to still have him with us today, when we heard about this crash, it brought back a lot of memories, we had to deal with a lot of nasty comments from people on newspaper websites who automatically blamed his driving (which it wasn't) we found it best to ignore them, they don't know the circumstances behind the accident,and one day it could be a member of their family.

afcbnewbury says...
2:58pm Wed 17 Oct 12

yiyayiya wrote:
If you dont like the way the Echo is reporting this then dont read it DUH!!!!

Not rocket science. I am glad they are giving out as many details as possible
You should be ashamed!

charlie2004 says...
3:53pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Another serious crash on the same stretch of road today. When are they going to do something about that road, too many people losing their lives and too many people being seriously injured. The speed limit along there should be reduced to 50mph, that might be a start.

endless journey says...
4:27pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Huey wrote:
yiyayiya wrote:
If you dont like the way the Echo is reporting this then dont read it DUH!!!!

Not rocket science. I am glad they are giving out as many details as possible
Well said.
Go away if you can't handle it.
Let those us of us who ARE interested find out what happened.
Huey, I'm pretty sure I.m not alone when I say reading your posts leaves me feeling a little uncomfortable.

Just exactly what is your interest in this awful event?

rudolph_hucker says...
9:27pm Wed 17 Oct 12

why was the car driving at speed in the layby I wonder?

ragj195 says...
5:21am Thu 18 Oct 12

rudolph_hucker wrote:
why was the car driving at speed in the layby I wonder?
I used to drive around 40k miles per year. Near the end of a 4 hour drive back from Manchester I was driving home along the A31. It was wet, dark and I was a little tired. What shook me was that having spent 3 hours on a 3 lane motorway I found myself nearly pulling into the layby at 70mph thinking it was in the inside lane and that I was in the middle lane of a 3 lane highway!

A few days later when I drove past the same place I tried to figure out why I almost did what I did. It shoudln't have happened as the different coloured cats eyes marked the left side of the inside lane. However, after a long journey, in the rain and night I nearly made and costly mistake!

RIP

sixhundred says...
9:32am Thu 18 Oct 12

charlie2004 wrote:
Another serious crash on the same stretch of road today. When are they going to do something about that road, too many people losing their lives and too many people being seriously injured. The speed limit along there should be reduced to 50mph, that might be a start.
I'd agree with this.

I drive the length of the A31 twice a day and the section down the hill into Ringwood and over the flyover isn't, in my opinion, suitable for 70mph traffic. Even on an open road with no traffic and clear weather driving over the flyover at 70 is too fast. I slow down but many don't. The A31 is 50 just a bit further down so I can't see why not enforce it a tad earlier (top of the hill for example).

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree