Residents' last ditch bid to keep out students

"Please keep students out of our road" "Please keep students out of our road"

RESIDENTS are preparing to make a last-ditch plea to councillors to keep restrictive conditions on a contentious development of student bedrooms.

The block of around 40 study bedrooms in Malmesbury Park Road was originally granted planning permission on the proviso the rooms could only be occupied by foreign students from the Kings School of English.

This restriction went some way to easing residents’ concerns that the development of small bedrooms with shared facilities would either become a “doss house” or an unwieldy university student block. But members of the town’s planning board are now being recommended to remove the reference to foreign students from Kings School of English, meaning it could accommodate students of any kind.

The planning report, which will be considered on Monday, states: “Student accommodation falls within the same use class regardless of the nationality of the students occupying the development.

“The council must consider whether it can reasonably distinguish between the occupation of the site by foreign and non-foreign students.”

But Queens Park councillor Carol Ainge said the distinction meant a great deal to residents: “If this is granted there will be repercussions for local residents for years to come,” she said.

“We never wanted this development in the first place but we were assured that it would only be used by students from one particular language school, who didn’t need very much living space or communal facilities but who simply needed somewhere to study.

“Having 40-odd university students in the middle of a residential area is a very different prospect. The developers knew these conditions were in place when they started work, it’s not fair to argue about it now when the development is almost finished.”

The application has been made by Malmesbury Estates, who are represented by Ken Parke planning consultants. Mr Parke has previously said that the removal of the conditions is “purely academic” and would not change the nature of the proposals.

Comments(31)

MandinVerwood says...
5:12pm Fri 21 Sep 12

7/10 for folding arms and looking cross. Slightly spoiled by the man on the right how appears to be grinning!

Bournefre says...
5:14pm Fri 21 Sep 12

If certain properties can stipulate things such as 'over 55s only' then could entire roads become 'over 55's roads?'

nonnisrevenge says...
5:24pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Blood-dee students with their multicoloured scarves and CND signs penned onto their canvas sling over satchels listening to the smiths, levellers and The wonder stuff ,making pasta bake and just generally being scruffs. I am in the right era aren’t I ?

BournemouthMum says...
5:49pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Who the hell do these people think they are?

willytee says...
5:57pm Fri 21 Sep 12

I don't live in the area so it doesn't bother me one way or the other. However, Bournefre makes an interesting point. If some developments can discriminate against age (over 55's only), or against children (as in some mobile home sites) then why not against university students.

malky53 says...
6:13pm Fri 21 Sep 12

If the council declines to remove the restriction on students by national origin it could fall foul of the public sector equality duty in the Equalities Act 2010

Equally I doubt if a council could stipulate over 55 only

Mike Pickering says...
6:19pm Fri 21 Sep 12

These people have no right to object to a private citizen living in a private housing unit in their street based on the occupation of that person. Point blank.
As has become true in the last few years, students are primarily consumers of education products for which they pay dearly - many of them will also be members of the workforce, and all blends in between. The protest is asinine in the extreme - outraged that people living just up the road of them won't be foreign or consumers of education courses - what absolute tosh, bugger off and do something useful with your time.
Jesus.

spooki says...
6:40pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Nimby

PokesdownMark says...
6:46pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Yeah what Mike said. Totally.

Imagine "keep students out of our road" but with a different group name instead of the word students. Distasteful.

fifty shades of brown envelopes says...
6:52pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Plebber

aerolover says...
7:08pm Fri 21 Sep 12

All the people who say it should go ahead have never lived in a road full of Uni students causing problems in the night and not allowing residents the right to a good nights sleep before they go to work. I say to you try it for a week or so then say let it go ahead Nimby YES we don't want any more yobish behaviour. The landlord wouldn't live with it so why should we?

High Treason says...
7:18pm Fri 21 Sep 12

aerolover wrote:
All the people who say it should go ahead have never lived in a road full of Uni students causing problems in the night and not allowing residents the right to a good nights sleep before they go to work. I say to you try it for a week or so then say let it go ahead Nimby YES we don't want any more yobish behaviour. The landlord wouldn't live with it so why should we?
Exactly. Once the usual students move in it becomes noisy, scruffy and run down. Look around the area, easy to spot student lets by the dirty windows, overgrown gardens, unswept drives etc.

manyogie says...
7:38pm Fri 21 Sep 12

aerolover wrote:
All the people who say it should go ahead have never lived in a road full of Uni students causing problems in the night and not allowing residents the right to a good nights sleep before they go to work. I say to you try it for a week or so then say let it go ahead Nimby YES we don't want any more yobish behaviour. The landlord wouldn't live with it so why should we?
spot on, Poole has changed for the worse since the Uni blocks came to town, just look at the new grounds out front of the swimming pool in the mornings, plus the noise factor and the habit of walking 4+ abreast.
Sorry Bournemouth Uni, but a good percentage of your live in pupils dont give a **** for their environment.

Oldcastle says...
8:06pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Since when do people have a say as to who moves in to their street? Perhaps these whingers should move into a private gated community where there are rules relating to new residents.

Talkingheadera says...
9:04pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Oldcastle wrote:
Since when do people have a say as to who moves in to their street? Perhaps these whingers should move into a private gated community where there are rules relating to new residents.
Exactly!
And how long has the Uni been there and the student areas.?
30 plus years.
Get a life and move if you don't wish to be in this area.
Nobody can choose their neighbours.

Huey says...
9:27pm Fri 21 Sep 12

I blame that channel tunnel

peopleareidiots says...
9:51pm Fri 21 Sep 12

They don't look like they're saying please to me! These are the UKs future brains we're talking about ;-)

ol'bag lady says...
10:07pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Talkingheadera wrote:
Oldcastle wrote:
Since when do people have a say as to who moves in to their street? Perhaps these whingers should move into a private gated community where there are rules relating to new residents.
Exactly!
And how long has the Uni been there and the student areas.?
30 plus years.
Get a life and move if you don't wish to be in this area.
Nobody can choose their neighbours.
What about the RESIDENTS who have lived here a lot longer than 30years?
YOU move and live here for a week then YOU would GET A LIFE and move alright. We do want to be in this area but to able to live in peace as we are entitled to and as you probably have the luxury and experience of enjoying - where ever you are.

Huey says...
10:35pm Fri 21 Sep 12

ol'bag lady wrote:
Talkingheadera wrote:
Oldcastle wrote:
Since when do people have a say as to who moves in to their street? Perhaps these whingers should move into a private gated community where there are rules relating to new residents.
Exactly!
And how long has the Uni been there and the student areas.?
30 plus years.
Get a life and move if you don't wish to be in this area.
Nobody can choose their neighbours.
What about the RESIDENTS who have lived here a lot longer than 30years?
YOU move and live here for a week then YOU would GET A LIFE and move alright. We do want to be in this area but to able to live in peace as we are entitled to and as you probably have the luxury and experience of enjoying - where ever you are.
Will numbers of students fall now it is something like £8-9,000pa to study?

Mike Pickering says...
11:01pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Students ARE residents.
What about their right to live somewhere free of busy-body protests ?
Why not simply have a large yellow "S" painted on the doors of people who happen to attend the college you decide, as to aid in their vilification ?
Then, maybe in retribution for the actions of other people who attend that, or another, college, there could be one night when the students get their windows smashed. We could call it, I don't know - "StudentinNacht".

High Treason says...
7:13am Sat 22 Sep 12

Mike Pickering wrote:
Students ARE residents.
What about their right to live somewhere free of busy-body protests ?
Why not simply have a large yellow "S" painted on the doors of people who happen to attend the college you decide, as to aid in their vilification ?
Then, maybe in retribution for the actions of other people who attend that, or another, college, there could be one night when the students get their windows smashed. We could call it, I don't know - "StudentinNacht".
You certainly post some rubbish.

brightspark4 says...
7:32am Sat 22 Sep 12

He has a point though - intolerance is wrong. Dealing with each incident rather than tarring everyone with the same brush is better - the latter is called prejudice and bigotry..and can lead to extremist thinking.

Talkingheadera says...
7:53am Sat 22 Sep 12

brightspark4 wrote:
He has a point though - intolerance is wrong. Dealing with each incident rather than tarring everyone with the same brush is better - the latter is called prejudice and bigotry..and can lead to extremist thinking.
Totally agree. Even if a few residents , and it will be only a few have lived there longer than 30 years, what's the big deal about mOving a mile or two away?
If I had noisy neighbours I'd move.
Maybe if people confronted problems in the right polite manner they'd solve the problem. Ranting and raving doesn't help.

ol'bag lady says...
8:12am Sat 22 Sep 12

Talkingheadera wrote:
brightspark4 wrote:
He has a point though - intolerance is wrong. Dealing with each incident rather than tarring everyone with the same brush is better - the latter is called prejudice and bigotry..and can lead to extremist thinking.
Totally agree. Even if a few residents , and it will be only a few have lived there longer than 30 years, what's the big deal about mOving a mile or two away?
If I had noisy neighbours I'd move.
Maybe if people confronted problems in the right polite manner they'd solve the problem. Ranting and raving doesn't help.
Why should I - after many years - have the upheaval of moving and all that goes with it - and a mile or two would not solve it. I do "confront the problems in the right polite manner" but they just don't want to understand - no more than you do. You obviously have not had the experience otherwise your view - looking from the outside in - would be totally different.

aerolover says...
8:26am Sat 22 Sep 12

Not all students are bad but it seem that when you do get problems it seems to happen year after year. The big problem is the landlords who buy up house, drive the price of other down so people can't move and all they care about is getting the rent. 99% of landlord don't live within 5 miles of the rented house and don't have to put up with the problems. If they did then perhaps they would act. The council is trying to bring in registration of all HMO's so they can control problems. blood good idea let's have it NOW.

brightspark4 says...
10:33am Sat 22 Sep 12

ol'bag lady wrote:
Talkingheadera wrote:
brightspark4 wrote:
He has a point though - intolerance is wrong. Dealing with each incident rather than tarring everyone with the same brush is better - the latter is called prejudice and bigotry..and can lead to extremist thinking.
Totally agree. Even if a few residents , and it will be only a few have lived there longer than 30 years, what's the big deal about mOving a mile or two away?
If I had noisy neighbours I'd move.
Maybe if people confronted problems in the right polite manner they'd solve the problem. Ranting and raving doesn't help.
Why should I - after many years - have the upheaval of moving and all that goes with it - and a mile or two would not solve it. I do "confront the problems in the right polite manner" but they just don't want to understand - no more than you do. You obviously have not had the experience otherwise your view - looking from the outside in - would be totally different.
I do have the experience - I live behind the university! We are all a product of our upbringing, age and class - and yours is showing in your attitude towards others.

ol'bag lady says...
11:43am Sat 22 Sep 12

brightspark4 wrote:
ol'bag lady wrote:
Talkingheadera wrote:
brightspark4 wrote:
He has a point though - intolerance is wrong. Dealing with each incident rather than tarring everyone with the same brush is better - the latter is called prejudice and bigotry..and can lead to extremist thinking.
Totally agree. Even if a few residents , and it will be only a few have lived there longer than 30 years, what's the big deal about mOving a mile or two away?
If I had noisy neighbours I'd move.
Maybe if people confronted problems in the right polite manner they'd solve the problem. Ranting and raving doesn't help.
Why should I - after many years - have the upheaval of moving and all that goes with it - and a mile or two would not solve it. I do "confront the problems in the right polite manner" but they just don't want to understand - no more than you do. You obviously have not had the experience otherwise your view - looking from the outside in - would be totally different.
I do have the experience - I live behind the university! We are all a product of our upbringing, age and class - and yours is showing in your attitude towards others.
Exactly, you live behind the University which is not where the students live and play. Not every body is a product of their upbringing but mine taught me to behave in a better manner and be considerate to others. I agree age has something to do with because I do not wish to be kept awake at all hours and have to live with the knock- on effect it brings. I am not against the younger generation - far from it - but some need to behave better. They are the products of their upbringing but do they act the same at home I wonder? Perhaps they need educating while still young into how to act when living away from home.
Class does not come into it although it would seem you think you are a cut above the rest of us.

brightspark4 says...
3:00pm Sat 22 Sep 12

There is a student village housing all the first years. I feel there are complainers who will not like babies crying dogs barking or a rowdy element of some students - I agree it can be a nuisance but reporting the worst and tolerating the others is necessary - everyone has to live somewhere - and the suggestion you move is a tad unreasonable, I agree. Why can't we just live and let live and deal with the worst offenders?

ol'bag lady says...
3:56pm Sat 22 Sep 12

brightspark4 wrote:
There is a student village housing all the first years. I feel there are complainers who will not like babies crying dogs barking or a rowdy element of some students - I agree it can be a nuisance but reporting the worst and tolerating the others is necessary - everyone has to live somewhere - and the suggestion you move is a tad unreasonable, I agree. Why can't we just live and let live and deal with the worst offenders?
Thank you -I totally agree.

jeebuscripes says...
5:46pm Sun 23 Sep 12

These people are outrageous and the councillor is wrong to get involved with them.

If the students break the law or become a nuisance phone the police.

kingstonpaul says...
1:23pm Tue 25 Sep 12

This feels like a form of apartheid. Will we need to develop townships for students? Alternatively, just develop the blocks in Boscombe.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree