Latest RSS Feed


Land contamination fears halt work on new AFC Bournemouth training pitches

HALTED: The site in Kings Park behind Dean Court where training pitches for Cherries are planned HALTED: The site in Kings Park behind Dean Court where training pitches for Cherries are planned

WORK on AFC Bournemouth’s new £600,000 development at King’s Park has been halted after the council took the club and chairman Eddie Mitchell’s building firm to court after land contamination fears.

The building of AFCB’s four new pitches is on hold for two months in the interests of public safety until a report on the former landfill site is approved by the Environment Agency.

Moving diggers in so soon showed “arrogance”, Recorder Ivor Weintroub told Bournemouth Crown Court in yesterday’s hearing.

But Mr Mitchell afterwards denied arrogance, saying he just liked to get things done.

Eddie Mitchell’s Seven Developments quickly made a start after gaining conditional planning permission for two grass pitches, two five-a-side pitches and a training area last month – before important studies into potential gas emission had been signed off.

This was an urgent and serious matter as contaminated land poses a threat to the general public, the court heard.

Recorder Weintroub said: “A risk of gas emission is a significant and important matter.

“The other is whether the soakaways are sufficient and what other drainage is required. Comments by the chairman of AFCB and owner of Seven Developments display a certain arrogance and disdain for the law which is unfortunate and should be thought about very carefully.”

If AFC Bournemouth and Seven Developments breach the agreement to wait until April 17, they will be in contempt of court and face fines, he added.

Mike Holmes, Service Director for Planning and Transport, said officers would be monitoring the site to check no work is done until the land contamination appraisal is approved in writing.

He said: “The purpose of the condition is to ensure public safety during the development works, and in the longer term.

“Only once the appraisal has been considered by the council and the Environment Agency, and approved in writing, can work begin on site.

“AFC Bournemouth and Seven Developments Ltd are in breach of the planning condition having already started work on site.”

AFC Bournemouth chairman Eddie Mitchell said: “Anybody would think we’re building a skyscraper,” said Eddie Mitchell, hitting out at the “ludicrous amount of bureaucracy” delaying the new pitches at King’s Park.

On Recorder Weintroub’s comments, he said: “If I am treated like a fool I have got to reply.

“I’ve got no arrogance at all, I just believe in getting things done. We’re trying to build an environment for the football club and the people of King’s Park.”

AFCB chief executive Neil Blake said they were “more or less there” with getting final approval and work would be up and running again by Wednesday.

Comments(12)

Old Colonial says...
10:18am Sat 11 Feb 12

"This was an urgent and serious matter as contaminated land poses a threat to the general public, the court heard."

But the council has been quite happy for the public to use it.....for how long?

mark.s says...
10:25am Sat 11 Feb 12

So the contamination of the land only becomes an urgent issue for the council, when the land is no longer the council's problem. Laughable.

Ferndown Steve says...
10:36am Sat 11 Feb 12

More contamination from the historical dog mess in my opinion !!

Lord Spring says...
10:50am Sat 11 Feb 12

Suprise ! Surprise!.
I used to go out there with my catapult as youngster and shoot at the rats when it was tip

elite50 says...
11:43am Sat 11 Feb 12

I used to play football at Iford Rec. after it was a tip.
Any-one getting a cut knew for sure that it would become infected.
Where was the Council then, when it was needed?

djd says...
11:46am Sat 11 Feb 12

As much as I agree with Eddie Mitchell and the club about the amount of bureaucracy involved in transforming this area, I feel Neil Blake's comments that 'work would be up and running again by Wednesday' is flying in the face of the Court ruling and there may well be repercussions if they do so.

John T says...
11:47am Sat 11 Feb 12

Who does Eddie Mitchell think he is, Harry Redknapp?!?
I hope there are prayers of worship for him before every match.

djd says...
12:00pm Sat 11 Feb 12

Just had a read of the Planning Decision notice sent to AFCB by the Council and Condition 4 states that no work shall start until the environmental statement has been approved by the Council.

nelsonstifflesboots says...
1:13pm Sat 11 Feb 12

There are some slightly naïve comments here.

The Council’s Conditions of Use on this matter are quite explicit and Mr Mitchell’s company are a long-established business that will have vast experience of such conditions (and the implications of ignoring them) in his development of sites within the local area.

The issue of potential land contamination at Kings Park is well known and the comments about it being there for years without causing problems are ill-informed. The whole point is that the ‘potential’ contamination is contained below the surface and digging it up or disturbing it will potentially expose the contamination to the public.

It is not only a requirement of the Environment Agency but also good practice for the football club and Seven Developments to determine the extent of any contamination and deal with the contamination safely to protect the wider general public.

This is standard environmental health and safety control in action which applies to every developer and NOT a bully boy council trying to make trouble for our beloved Cherries.

Get real people – this is the world in which we live !

I am sure that whilst Mr Mitchell’s desire to get things done are well intentioned perhaps he would have been better intentioned if he had proceeded with a contaminated land report in the first instance.

Then again I get the impression he is a do first person then think about the implications....

UTCIAD.

TheDistrict says...
4:54pm Sat 11 Feb 12

Years and years of FoKP dog mess. At least EM will be the first to clear it away.
.
Beaurocracy at its best.
.

Yankee1 says...
11:36pm Sat 11 Feb 12

mark.s wrote:
So the contamination of the land only becomes an urgent issue for the council, when the land is no longer the council's problem. Laughable.
Predictable.

Lord Spring says...
2:51pm Sun 12 Feb 12

Yankee1 wrote:
mark.s wrote:
So the contamination of the land only becomes an urgent issue for the council, when the land is no longer the council's problem. Laughable.
Predictable.
It is still owned by the council.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree