Latest RSS Feed


'Free' bus travel costs millions


SO-CALLED ‘free’ bus travel for the over-60s is costing Dorset taxpayers millions of pounds – and is set to get worse.

Bournemouth council taxpayers will fork out £3.7m to subsidise the government’s concessionary bus fare scheme this year.

Other councils are also having to raid their coffers for hundreds of thousands every year to do the same.

But instead of getting more cash to cover the shortfall, Dorset councils look set to be dealt a hammer-blow by a Department for Transport consultation, which proposes thousands more are slashed from their budgets next year.

Purbeck has warned other services could suffer, and Christchurch has revealed the shortfall is costing the average council taxpayer £22 a year.

The proposed cuts relate to a government review of the extra grants it made available to fund the extension of the free bus travel scheme in April last year – allowing over-60s to travel on buses anywhere in the country for free.

According to the consultation document, East Dorset and North Dorset district councils could lose £100,000 each from their 2010-11 budgets, while Purbeck would be down £110,000.

Whilst Christchurch and Poole will not see any change, both claim the travel schemes are so badly under-funded that overall shortfalls will be massive. Only Bournemouth is set to benefit, with a proposed additional £70,000 of funding – a drop in the ocean compared to the shortfall.

Cllr John Beesley, cabinet member for resources, said the announcement showed the funding mechanism was failing and Bournemouth taxpayers were shelling out for “the high level of visitors” taking advantage of the scheme in the town.

“This year council tax payers will pick up £3.7 million of the bill with it only costing the government £1.2 million of the total,” he said.


Your Say YourDorset

wonderway, boscombe says...
8:23am Mon 9 Nov 09

Cllr John Beesley, cabinet member for resources, said the announcement showed the funding mechanism was failing and Bournemouth taxpayers were shelling out for “the high level of visitors” taking advantage of the scheme in the town.

“This year council tax payers will pick up £3.7 million of the bill with it only costing the government £1.2 million of the total,” he said.

At last Cabinet Meeting he was bragging that the council had save £600,000 on consessionary fares this year alone sooy Mr B you talk trash. You even gave Air Show £50,000 extra from this saving £70,000 to scrutiny panel to make cost savings over 2 years and £50,000 to Cabinet Member to make those cuts

Again you tell people one thing and a month later another so please be honest because the Audit Team has shown how clever this council are with money and you are the person pulling the purse strings and at present nothing adds up

Adrian Fudge, Bournemouth says...
8:35am Mon 9 Nov 09

wonderway wrote:
Cllr John Beesley, cabinet member for resources, said the announcement showed the funding mechanism was failing and Bournemouth taxpayers were shelling out for “the high level of visitors” taking advantage of the scheme in the town. “This year council tax payers will pick up £3.7 million of the bill with it only costing the government £1.2 million of the total,” he said. At last Cabinet Meeting he was bragging that the council had save £600,000 on consessionary fares this year alone sooy Mr B you talk trash. You even gave Air Show £50,000 extra from this saving £70,000 to scrutiny panel to make cost savings over 2 years and £50,000 to Cabinet Member to make those cuts Again you tell people one thing and a month later another so please be honest because the Audit Team has shown how clever this council are with money and you are the person pulling the purse strings and at present nothing adds up
Precisely right
I think the main word in this comment is "honest"
A couple of months ago Cllr Beesley was saying how they were going to have to make swinging cuts to keep Council tax increases under5%, then
having spent the saving on the bus travel ,he again states that they are going to have to make cuts in front line services ,he is then quoted as saying they are going to bring in a low increase in Council Tax, and now he is beboaning a supposed substantial cost.
Its good to see that he has a firm grip on what is going on -----NOT

mark0peters, Bournemouth says...
8:44am Mon 9 Nov 09

Bus travel and rail travel should be free / subsidised for students and the elderly who make the decision that they should stop driving.
....
The OAP drivers who keep driving beyond the age where it is safe put others at risk and it would be better for them on the bus.
....
The public transport in Bournemouth Poole Christchurch Highcliff etc should improve 1000% -It would get cars off the road and provide freedom for many.
..
The cost of fantastic public transport would be ofset by the reduction in cars on the road, polution, insurance claims and increased health for the elderly - hence less cost for healthcare.

rayc, Wimborne says...
8:46am Mon 9 Nov 09

"Cllr John Beesley, cabinet member for resources, said the announcement showed the funding mechanism was failing and Bournemouth taxpayers were shelling out for “the high level of visitors” taking advantage of the scheme in the town".
Any idea how much these vistors are contributing to the town? They come to Bournemouth and spend money that perhaps they wouldn't spend without the free travel. The problem is the council do not know what they want - they want people out of cars but they want income from car parks. They want income from everything but have no idea how to provide a service.

O'Really, Christchurch says...
8:48am Mon 9 Nov 09

markOpeters; well said!

rook, wimborne says...
9:00am Mon 9 Nov 09

Totally agree that public transport should be free to as many people as possible for many good reasons.

Can someone enlighten me on the difference between the government paying for something and the taxpayers paying it? As far as most are concerned tax is tax whether local or national - we just don't want it wasted or apportioned unfairly. If the article is actually saying that Dorset taxpayers are having to top up the grant while other councils are overfunded, then I agree that's wrong, but it seems to imply that all councils are having to top up (even though Bournemouth's grant is actually increasing).

Frogham Ferret, Frogham says...
9:19am Mon 9 Nov 09

If only we had a bus service. There's the sc hool buses, or a 2 mile walk to the A338 for a bus.

SnakeskinCowboy, Weymouth says...
9:25am Mon 9 Nov 09

Over 60's should be given the option of giving up their cars OR getting a free bus pass.

Too many dangerous OAPs on the road that have perfectly good buss passes sitting on the shelves at home.

West Howe Sean, Bournemouth says...
9:27am Mon 9 Nov 09

The answer on all levels is to bring the buses back into public ownership and provide a service free to all at the point of use.
We would then have a real incentive to turn our back on the car. And the cost would only be actual cost as there would be no need to make a profit for shareholders.
We would all win.

retired lady, Bournemouth says...
9:47am Mon 9 Nov 09

When I use my pass I am never asked my destination, so how do the bus company know how much to claim for? Does anybody know exactly how the system works?

rayc, Wimborne says...
9:55am Mon 9 Nov 09

retired lady wrote:
When I use my pass I am never asked my destination, so how do the bus company know how much to claim for? Does anybody know exactly how the system works?
Thats what I would like to know. Are the bus companies getting a subsidy up front that would dissappear if there was no free travel? Are they paid per journey - in some places I am issued with a ticket when using the pass but not by Wilts & Dorset Without the subsidy would the bus company still have to run buses but without passsengers?

rayc, Wimborne says...
9:59am Mon 9 Nov 09

SnakeskinCowboy wrote:
Over 60's should be given the option of giving up their cars OR getting a free bus pass. Too many dangerous OAPs on the road that have perfectly good buss passes sitting on the shelves at home.
How goes that stack up with the government raising the retirement age towards 70? There are bus drivers who are over 60 and I would suggest that a 60 year old experienced driver is safer than your average 21 year old any day - insurance companies think so too.

bcf203, Bournemouth says...
10:04am Mon 9 Nov 09

Would be a disaster if buses were put back into public ownership. Imagine if run and organised by Bournemouth Council!

I also believe that while agree should be very low cost for pensioners there should be a nominal charge per journey of say 20/30p which would not put off any passengers and would then collect money from all the visitors to the area.

pd7, Dorset says...
10:04am Mon 9 Nov 09

Better free travel the the over 60's than buying laptops for looking at ****.

poolebabe, poole says...
10:05am Mon 9 Nov 09

Perhaps the government should issue free bus passes to those who want or need them over 60. I totally agree with what someone else said that there are a lot of people who have bus passes gathering dust who do not need or want them. It's common sense isn't it?

peter hurt, adelaide says...
10:15am Mon 9 Nov 09

They are assuming that if the transport wasn't free that the pensioners would be paying for the ride. I'd suggest that there would just be fewer passengers and only a small increase in revenue if full fares was reintroduced. Busses would run half empty but with the same expenses.
Another point is that most of the pensioners are also residents and continue to pay rates like the rest of the population.
Bet this Beesley chap will never have to worry about paying for a bus fare!

fedupwithjobsworths, Moordown says...
10:19am Mon 9 Nov 09

Any shortfall coud easily be made up by getting rid of some of the Council's non-jobs and charging staff to park at the Town Hall.

mikey2gorgeous, Bournemouth says...
10:26am Mon 9 Nov 09

As a local tax-payer i agree wholeheartedly with the comments above.
We are supposed to be a civillised society - free bus travel for senior citizens is one of the marks of that.
It also has the benefit of raising the general level of non-car transport infrastructure which will benefit us all.

Dennis Neal, Colehill says...
10:27am Mon 9 Nov 09

As an 80 year old user of my bus pass, I feel I have a right to comment.
I gave up driving 7 years ago when my eyesight was failing, this was my choice, but should not have been so. There should be compulsory eye tests for all drivers, not simply the elderly. Getting a driving licence should be dependant upon the ability to demonstrate that you are physically and mentally fit to hold one and should be renewable every year.
Get the bad drivers off the road.
I walk 3 or 4 miles every day and take the bus home, but could not do so without the benefits of free bus travel.
It seems that many people abuse the system, but who can blame them. It is a nation wide scheme and wide open to abuse.
I recently took a holiday in Torquay and used the local bus services every day to get around. The service was excellent and well used.
I would support the idea of free travel only in your own locality if that is really necessary.



Mozzer, Southbourne says...
10:29am Mon 9 Nov 09

This is a total red herring about juggling council budgets or such like.

Free travel doesn't cost anyone anything unless either a fare-paying passenger is unable to get on a bus that is full (and has 'free passengers'), or a service is only run for the benefit of those enjoying free travel (which I very much doubt)

'Free bus travel costs millions', my left foot! (I would say what Jim Royle says, but it's a polite forum here)

mikey2gorgeous, Bournemouth says...
10:30am Mon 9 Nov 09

Can the Echo please balance this sensationalist article by providing details of how much is spent locally (from both local & central taxation) on other forms of transport infrastructure? This figure is meaningless unless compared to road-building etc figures.

Square Old Codger, Bournemouth says...
10:52am Mon 9 Nov 09

The "free" bus passes are a great idea, they allow many pensioners to travel and to make journeys that they otherwise wouldn't, without them the Bus Companies would slash the number of buses and services and many better off Pensioners would use their cars more. For the Bus Companies, it has been "Manna from Heaven" they have ruthlessly cut all cross Town Services, cut all Services that don't return a signficant profit and exploit the situation by having a wheel system in operation, th hub the Town Centre, to go anywhere else you have to use 2/3 buses and many areas are completely isolated as a result. They have never had it so good, just look at their accounts - profits are soaring.In service terms it was far better travelling when the Yellow Buses belonged to the Town. Journey times are now slower than the Horse Drawn days.!!

retired lady, Bournemouth says...
11:19am Mon 9 Nov 09

I once asked an MP why some benefits (bus passes, child benefit and winter fuel payment to name a few) were not means tested. The answer was that it would cost more in admin fees to means test people than they would save!!! You couldn't make it up could you?

wayneofafcb, poole says...
11:19am Mon 9 Nov 09

I think the bus companies get flat rate for every free pass holder, around one pound per pass holder per journey.
Whilst I agree with the system, it should come from central government funds. These schemes are fine, but with council taxes on the increase, and vital services being cut,it should not be down to all council tax payers to fund the scheme. many of whom who are retired and have no income anyway bar pension.

councilworker, Dorset says...
11:23am Mon 9 Nov 09

Having had some involvement with operating this scheme in one of our local authorities, I can assure you the LA's are very fed up with the way that the bus companies charge for this. Yes, they charge a full journey for each and every occasion that a concessionary travel person gets on the bus! I would imagine they get some discount on the entire amount, but it does cost a huge amount! However, it is known that some councils up north actually make some money as their grant is more than they have to pay out to the bus companies!

Surely the simplest answer is that the bus companies bill central government direct and the only involvement that the local authorities have is to capture peoples information to allow them to get the cards! Then the government would also see how much it truly costs for the scheme!


colin 50, bournemouth says...
11:24am Mon 9 Nov 09

why we are making comments on this subject is beyond me, we all know bournemouth council is a past master at twisting the truth and burying their heads in the sand, OR LAPTOPS IN SOME CASES, £40,000 plus could be saved by getting rid of 1 senior member of staff who used council property for visiting **** sites, this money could go into the travel kitty and he could be given a free bus pass out of the town,there should also be a charge for anyone using the infamous surf reef and try and recuperate some of the millions of residents pounds these idiots at the town hall has spent, their motto should be, we know best sod the rest.

rainbowkisses, Bournemouth says...
11:25am Mon 9 Nov 09

Lots of you commented about providing free transport of the elderly (and students?). The story headline says it all. There is no such thing as a free lunch, or in this case, ride. If all the people who advocate free rides are willing to accept a hike in the Council tax, above and beyond what we normally get, then free passes are viable. If you are all going to moan about how high your taxes are, then it isn't. The simple fact is, somebody has to pay for all htese "free" rides. I'm not against them per se, but if they can not be financed properly, they may'be they should think again about how they are run. As one commenter said, may'be an notional fee. After all, pensioners are not the only ones who are short of money and find it difficult to afford buses. As for the comment about how the system works. Each time you get on a bus, showing our card, the driver logs are card use into his machine. (You will have seen him pressing a buton on the machine) This keeps a total of the passengers using the service via the card. Transev then bill the Council for those numbers. The Council pay Transdev about 65p (although I may be wrong on that figure now) per customer trip. So it doesnt matter if you only travel 2 stops, or clear across town, they get paid the same. They also get paid again when you come back mind. By the way, the same system applies to the disabled, in case there are any out there who have not claimed for their free bus pass. They are also entitled to a free pass for their carer too, but have to travel together.

Emulated, Bournemouth says...
11:39am Mon 9 Nov 09

Instead of giving a free bus pass to the over 60's why don't they increase the Pension Credit rate. There must be many who have enough money to travel and don't need a bus pass.

Bob49, Bournemouth says...
11:43am Mon 9 Nov 09

retired lady wrote:
I once asked an MP why some benefits (bus passes, child benefit and winter fuel payment to name a few) were not means tested. The answer was that it would cost more in admin fees to means test people than they would save!!! You couldn't make it up could you?
You don't seem to quite grasp how the sysyem works. Benefits are universal as it is simpler to adjust the tax level than deal with all the variables.

John T, Poole says...
11:50am Mon 9 Nov 09

Cllr Beesley said: 'Bournemouth taxpayers were shelling out for the 'high level of visitors' taking advantage of the scheme in the town.'
Any shortfall caused by the ' high level of visitors' should be more than met by the £30 million supposedly generated by over a million visitors to the Air Show. Or did this money disappear into thin air or more likely under the sea?!

Bournemouth person, Bournemouth says...
11:51am Mon 9 Nov 09

It makes great sense to continue free travel as a number of local pensioners depend on it for many important aspects of life - shopping, visiting friends, going to the doctor are just some of these.
Also why clog up the roads and have empty buses!!
Travel by public transport should be promoted to give faster and more reliable journeys and reduce carbon emissions ...

artyboy1936, says...
12:13pm Mon 9 Nov 09

I asked the bus driver,does the number 12 go over seldowns bridge,
It better had he said, or we will all be in the river Avon.

djd, bournemouth says...
12:22pm Mon 9 Nov 09

Someone has commented that free buses should only be given to those who ask for them.
It doesn't matter if you have a bus pass and don't use it.. the bus company only registers your pass when you use it.
I find it odd in this area that you are never asked for your destination when you tender your pass.Other places in the country, the driver asks your destination and issues you with a zero value ticket to that destination.
Does that mean bus companies charge the maximum for each journey rather than for the distance you travel ?
Free bus travel pays for itself further north in the country simply because the Local Authorities are given more money by the Government and don't have to subsidise the scheme.

idontknowifitistrue, in the wilds says...
12:25pm Mon 9 Nov 09

artyboy1936, That was the best post of all, cheered me up no end.

[Chris], WWW says...
12:34pm Mon 9 Nov 09

Is this another Beesley hint to the fact that the 2010/11 Council Tax Bills will be greater than expected, and actually nothing to do with the Free Bus Passes. This Council and Cllrs have spent so much money on rubbish projects such as the Surf Reef, Boscombe Spa Village, the proposed Velodrome, but has failed to realise its own financial status, with the proviso that the Bournemouth public will pay it back with another near 5% rise in Council Tax.
.
Where did the £30m go from the Air Show. Can anyone in some sort of authority explain this. Where does all the revenue from Council Taxes from residents and traders go to, where does all the car park fees go to, where does the percentage of bus fares go to. Is it not time that McLoughlin, Beesley and Co came clean and told us, in laymans terms.
.
Of course the over 60s are entitled to free travel (No I am not over 60, yet), and why not. Of course they are entitled to the Heating Allowance, and why not.
.
There is only one body wrong on this matter, and that is the Council.

[Chris], WWW says...
12:34pm Mon 9 Nov 09

Is this another Beesley hint to the fact that the 2010/11 Council Tax Bills will be greater than expected, and actually nothing to do with the Free Bus Passes. This Council and Cllrs have spent so much money on rubbish projects such as the Surf Reef, Boscombe Spa Village, the proposed Velodrome, but has failed to realise its own financial status, with the proviso that the Bournemouth public will pay it back with another near 5% rise in Council Tax.
.
Where did the £30m go from the Air Show. Can anyone in some sort of authority explain this. Where does all the revenue from Council Taxes from residents and traders go to, where does all the car park fees go to, where does the percentage of bus fares go to. Is it not time that McLoughlin, Beesley and Co came clean and told us, in laymans terms.
.
Of course the over 60s are entitled to free travel (No I am not over 60, yet), and why not. Of course they are entitled to the Heating Allowance, and why not.
.
There is only one body wrong on this matter, and that is the Council.

cantique, bournemouth says...
12:56pm Mon 9 Nov 09

I travelled to Poole from Bournemouth recently and used my bus pass, rather than the car. The journey took at least twice as long as it would have done in the car, but didn't cost me anything. However, it didn't actually cost the bus company anything either. The bus was making the journey anyway, and was not full at any point, so no fare-paying passengers were lost. Once again, the council is bleating abouts costs of the scheme (as it bleats about everything) but quite honestly in this area anything which reduces the number of cars on the road must be a good thing.

Mike Pickering, Bournemouth says...
1:48pm Mon 9 Nov 09

You sold the bus company.

Now to operate a 'free' service, you have to pay the shareholders of the bus company the costs of operating the bus, AND an amount of profit.

You would not have had to pay this money if you had not sold the bus company.

I can't make it any simpler than this - if people in, and I use the term very loosely - positions of power do not understand this as the most important fact when talking about 'free' rides on the bus system, then there is absolutely no hope whatsoever for any rational conversation about the 'problem', and no forseeable resolution will ever be forthcoming.

What a ship of fools, I'm (nearly) at a loss for words.

Trifecta, Southbourne says...
1:58pm Mon 9 Nov 09

Mike Pickering has hit the nail on the head and the chutzpah of certain former councillors never ceases to amaze me !

MoordownMarc, Bournemouth says...
2:07pm Mon 9 Nov 09

councilworker wrote:
Having had some involvement with operating this scheme in one of our local authorities, I can assure you the LA's are very fed up with the way that the bus companies charge for this. Yes, they charge a full journey for each and every occasion that a concessionary travel person gets on the bus! I would imagine they get some discount on the entire amount, but it does cost a huge amount! However, it is known that some councils up north actually make some money as their grant is more than they have to pay out to the bus companies! Surely the simplest answer is that the bus companies bill central government direct and the only involvement that the local authorities have is to capture peoples information to allow them to get the cards! Then the government would also see how much it truly costs for the scheme!
Which Council did you work for? What you state is quite untrue. Bus Companies recieve between 45% and 60% of the average cash fare paid for the route concerned - or in other words 45-60pence in the pound for a full length journey (say B'mth to Poole). Some Councils down South did also have fare money left over, Bournemouth Council £50,000 to the airshow - fare surplus from Government!

GB916, christchurch says...
2:15pm Mon 9 Nov 09

Tis the season to be jolley,lots of councillors with a cash filled trolley
>
>fa la la la la la la la la
deck the public with rubbish about a shortfall of money.....
>
>fa la la la la la la la la
They think we are stupid so lets steal the trolly>>>

Bob49, Bournemouth says...
2:32pm Mon 9 Nov 09

This farce should be stopped as soon as possible. By all means provide free bus travel for those in need of it not those able to easily afford it. It is galling to go through the Purbeck and see the bus stops with numerous 'hikers' queueing up for their free ride. And before the usual suspects squeak my brother-in law drives a bus over there and says the same type of people would have been using the bus and paying a few years back. £500 for a holiday cottage then ponce of the rest of us for free tourist travel. I would suggest that a few of the numpties on here take a look around other news sites. This is a nationwide problem. The bloke a few doors away is a very 'thirsty' man, hence he uses the bus to and from his pub in Christchurch, Previously he paid, he is a bricklayer earning in excess of £1000, drives a £30k 4x4 and is 61 or 62. I can't believe that free bus travel was set up for these kind of people. Without drastic action the greedy will once again ruin something that does provide a great service for those who need it - not the usual selfish crew.

AKKA, Poole says...
2:59pm Mon 9 Nov 09

artyboy1936 wrote:
I asked the bus driver,does the number 12 go over seldowns bridge, It better had he said, or we will all be in the river Avon.
Great joke but wrong bridge. Seldown nowhere near Avon.

Other posters have mentioned people who don't use their bus pass. If they don't get on a bus then the company can't charge for the journey so no cost.



rook, wimborne says...
3:06pm Mon 9 Nov 09

No doubt Bob and Retiredlady spent the money they earn/earned so feel free travel should only be provided to those with little money. Unlucky to those people who saved a bit and managed their money properly and now are expected to pay for travel and care when others get it free.

Burton Saint, Christchurch says...
3:18pm Mon 9 Nov 09

I'm over 60. Still working full time and eligible for a bus pass and winter heating allowance. In addition I can get free eye tests, prescriptions and no doubt other concessions.

Do I need them? - not really but because I am the age I am 'entitled'.

Ridiculous really as I can afford bus fares, etc. if I want.

Stupid thing is that many people who can't afford these things who are under the age of 60 are excluded.

The whole welfare system needs reforming and elements taken away from local petty officials.

pipistrollers, Bournemouth says...
3:23pm Mon 9 Nov 09

I read this article then read the article entitled 'Agency Recruits Still Costing us Thousands.'

So elderly people and disabled people who cannot drive are the latest targets for this Council it would seem yet at the same time, they are happy to pay out almost 100 thousand pounds for some agency person to do a job not worth half that wage. Could you please explain this Cllr Beesley? Of course you cant!!

Also, Beesley knows full well that people come to bournemouth with their wallets and purses ready to spend money on their holidays and day trips which more than makes up for their free bus travel.

As others have asked, what about all those millions from the air show? Where are they????

Bob49, Bournemouth says...
3:25pm Mon 9 Nov 09

What a load of old tosh. What has what I do, or did, with my money got to do with this ? Are you presuming that I qualify for a free bus pass or that I might have done under the old scheme ? To think that people like rook will be allowed to vote next year is probably more alarming than the over cost of this scheme ! Many of these so called spendthrifts worked in lowly paid jobs. They managed their money - they had no choice ! As to being expected to travel for free that was never on the cards when those, who were able, were saving. So stop whining. This is a new scheme, introduced with the best of intentions but very quickly proven to be flawed - reading the selfish comments from rook it's not hard to see why.

ngdragon, says...
4:13pm Mon 9 Nov 09

I dont see why it should be free unless you are on income support or over 75. People who live near me have cars and good holidays etc. so why cant they pay the bus fare to town? Pay packets will be frozen this year more than likely, council tax wont, why should the tax payer subsidise free busses to town? My sone who has no income has to pay his fare!!

John T, Poole says...
4:24pm Mon 9 Nov 09

The Council Taxpayer is expected to cough up millions on a surf reef that will attract hundreds, at most, and on policing hen and stag parties every weekend from far and wide, and yet Cllr Beesley objects to a scheme that attracts to the area hundreds of thousands of responsible over 60s spending their 'grey pounds'. No wonder this town is going to pot!

[Chris], WWW says...
4:31pm Mon 9 Nov 09

The biggest freeby is the prescription service. Has anyone wondered why each year it goes up. Next rise, or it maybe in force is £7.20 per item on a prescription. This is a phenominal price for any service to have to fork out for, and for any person on minimal salary or pensions to pay for. When one thinks how many people are on free or subsidised prescriptions, you would be overwhelmed at how many. Having worked on some figures, if everyone from birth through to say 75 paid £1 per prescription, yes £1, regardless of items, the service would make more money, with less coming from NHS, PCTs, and any other service that has to subsidise what is not paid. Heating is another anomaly. Regardless of who lives in the house, a heating allowance is offered to those over 60 regardless of income, and numbers. If the household overall can afford heating, why then should allowances be given.
.
We all accept these benefits for granted, and so we should, but do we think of the cost that has to be gained elsewhere. Nothing is really free, as what is lost somewhere is gained somewhere else.

mikey2gorgeous, Bournemouth says...
4:43pm Mon 9 Nov 09

@bob - so are you saying this 60 year old bricklayer on £1000 per week hasn't paid much tax & NI over the years? I think he's probably paid enough to earn a bus pass!

upyourpipe, Bearcross says...
4:58pm Mon 9 Nov 09

In a few years i will reach the age of sixty and be entitled to a free bus pass as will my wife, will i use it, i doubt it very much but the bus companies will still recieve a certain amount of council tax payers money for suppying me and my wife for the passes.
This is just another policy instigated by the tree hugging dipsticks for climate change in an attemot to get me out of my car.
Unless i was forced to on medical grounds i would not even contemplate using busses, they are dirty, unreliable and inconvienant.
Why would i pay for my car to be taxed, insured and motd just to leave it at home and walk through the wind and rain in a vain attempt to carry a weeks shopping home on the bus.
I think that people over sixty should be asked if they want a bus pass before sending them out and then asking the council tax payer to stump up the cost, this would save thousands.
Nearly every other benifit in this country is means tested so why not bus passes.
I can understand that passes are a must for some people and i would not want to deny them the right to have one but can it really be fair that a family who live in a mansion and drive or own two or three cars should be entitled to a bus pass which we all have to pay for.
Stop dishing them out to all and sundrie and let people decide if they actually need one, this could save thousands.

jobsworthwatch, Bournemouth says...
5:56pm Mon 9 Nov 09

bcf203 wrote:
Would be a disaster if buses were put back into public ownership. Imagine if run and organised by Bournemouth Council! I also believe that while agree should be very low cost for pensioners there should be a nominal charge per journey of say 20/30p which would not put off any passengers and would then collect money from all the visitors to the area.
When the buses were council run they took you to your destination with out taking you on a tour of Bournemouth, ie. pretty well the most direct route. Now when a bus stops at a bus stop it spends so long there that you think its broken down. When council run, they had conductors on them. Most ofthe time while under council control, most of the buses were trolley buses thereby taking the polution out of the town.
However in this age of the jobsworth empire biulder, HSE and PC I suspect you may be right!

bofors, bournemouth says...
6:04pm Mon 9 Nov 09

upyourpipe wrote:
In a few years i will reach the age of sixty and be entitled to a free bus pass as will my wife, will i use it, i doubt it very much but the bus companies will still recieve a certain amount of council tax payers money for suppying me and my wife for the passes.
This is just another policy instigated by the tree hugging dipsticks for climate change in an attemot to get me out of my car.
Unless i was forced to on medical grounds i would not even contemplate using busses, they are dirty, unreliable and inconvienant.
Why would i pay for my car to be taxed, insured and motd just to leave it at home and walk through the wind and rain in a vain attempt to carry a weeks shopping home on the bus.
I think that people over sixty should be asked if they want a bus pass before sending them out and then asking the council tax payer to stump up the cost, this would save thousands.
Nearly every other benifit in this country is means tested so why not bus passes.
I can understand that passes are a must for some people and i would not want to deny them the right to have one but can it really be fair that a family who live in a mansion and drive or own two or three cars should be entitled to a bus pass which we all have to pay for.
Stop dishing them out to all and sundrie and let people decide if they actually need one, this could save thousands.
Havent the people in a mansion,paid in as well,surely running 2 or 3 cars means they are paying out a lot in car tax and fuel tax, which as we all know goes into the coffers.On top of that they have probably paid a lot of income tax.

gglightning, Bournemouth says...
6:13pm Mon 9 Nov 09

There are many pensioners who can well afford to pay the full bus fare but would resent having to should other less well off ones get free bus travel. Why not charge every O.A.P. 20p a journey? This is affordable to everyone and would help toreduce the huge cost to the taxpayers which ultimately affects the services provided to everyone.

upyourpipe, Bearcross says...
6:29pm Mon 9 Nov 09

bofors wrote:
upyourpipe wrote:
In a few years i will reach the age of sixty and be entitled to a free bus pass as will my wife, will i use it, i doubt it very much but the bus companies will still recieve a certain amount of council tax payers money for suppying me and my wife for the passes.
This is just another policy instigated by the tree hugging dipsticks for climate change in an attemot to get me out of my car.
Unless i was forced to on medical grounds i would not even contemplate using busses, they are dirty, unreliable and inconvienant.
Why would i pay for my car to be taxed, insured and motd just to leave it at home and walk through the wind and rain in a vain attempt to carry a weeks shopping home on the bus.
I think that people over sixty should be asked if they want a bus pass before sending them out and then asking the council tax payer to stump up the cost, this would save thousands.
Nearly every other benifit in this country is means tested so why not bus passes.
I can understand that passes are a must for some people and i would not want to deny them the right to have one but can it really be fair that a family who live in a mansion and drive or own two or three cars should be entitled to a bus pass which we all have to pay for.
Stop dishing them out to all and sundrie and let people decide if they actually need one, this could save thousands.
Havent the people in a mansion,paid in as well,surely running 2 or 3 cars means they are paying out a lot in car tax and fuel tax, which as we all know goes into the coffers.On top of that they have probably paid a lot of income tax.
Most of todays penshioners have paid into the system all their lives but if they are a couple of pounds over a certain amount in their savings they are denied extra penshion credits and housing benefits to name a couple.
Paying into the system does not entitle you to every freebie on offer and bus passes are quite a new idea compared to most of the others.
If penshioners who own mansions and have savings that some of us can only dream of then why should they receive a bus pass when they could easily afford the fare.
Sorry to say this but there is a fixation in tis country today to have most benifets means tested and i would rather see the money that these passes cost go to people who are in fuel poverty of people who have to chose wheather to buy food or put their heating on.
As some one said above when a bus pass is used the driver has not a clue where your going nor do they scan the cards which suggests that we pay for every bus pass that is issued wheather it is used or not, this is a total waste of our money.
So who cares who has paid into the system, in these days of recession we should be watching every penny and those who are in the position of supporting themselves easily should do so without sponging from the rest of us.
To hand bus passes out to everybody over sixty is the worse case of waste i have heard of, if we go down this road then lets stop all means testing for everybody and let the over sixties claim everything from pension credit, housing benefit and bus passes what ever they earn or what ever they own, if that happens watch your tax and national insurance rise then

bobaub, Poole says...
6:40pm Mon 9 Nov 09

The amount bus companies charge for their service is too much. Why should they care who is paying the bill. As for local or national government paying the bill, local has a budget, far less than the national bill. All paid for by tax payers. If the government says it is free, then the shortfall should be met by Whitehall. Period. Local councils should not have to make cuts to make up the difference.
I am over sixty, still drive professionally, and have a bus pass. I will use my own car, drive my works bus and use any bus service with my free pass. It's called free choice.

ray142, branksome says...
6:50pm Mon 9 Nov 09

Here we go again, lets knock all the poor old codgers over 60 who cant even drive, by the younger tail gating, over the speed limit and through the red light herberts that can't even spell.

akatek, Bournemouth says...
7:00pm Mon 9 Nov 09

Best comment so far is from councilworker; direct billing of central overnment should greatly reduce administration costs and ensure fairness. As someone else has commented TAX is TAX, Local or Central.
As to driving competence, mature drivers are far superior since they aim to help others to share use of the road system whereas the immature drivers set out to compete with everyone they encounter. The insurance companies have the resultling figures and charge accordingly. By the way, I paid tax throughout my 50 year working life and am still doing so like many other retired folk who feel we have we have already paid in full for our bus passes.

bobaub, Poole says...
7:33pm Mon 9 Nov 09

gglightning wrote:
There are many pensioners who can well afford to pay the full bus fare but would resent having to should other less well off ones get free bus travel. Why not charge every O.A.P. 20p a journey? This is affordable to everyone and would help toreduce the huge cost to the taxpayers which ultimately affects the services provided to everyone.
This is a government decision. Are you thinking of means testing everyone. Tax payers only need apply!

t.p.forster, bournemouth says...
8:35pm Mon 9 Nov 09

a positve point for all politicians. All bus pass holders have the VOTE. Note well and consider.

rainbowkisses, Bournemouth says...
9:06pm Mon 9 Nov 09


Look on the bright side.....if Labour MP David Chaytor had had his way, we would be paying for all under 21s to have a free national bus pass too.

retired lady, Bournemouth says...
10:12pm Mon 9 Nov 09

Get ready - we'll all be discussing the winter fuel payment soon!!!!

Trooper2, says...
12:19pm Tue 10 Nov 09

Retired Lady. Where is it? Have we heard anything?
Forgive me if I have missed any points above. I have not had time to read the entire list of comments.
I do not understand how the Government can expect us to give up our cars and get onto a public transport system which is virtually no existent.
To save money 'bus passes should be applied for if you do not have any other means of transport and you NEED them. Not given out willy-nilly to all and sundry over 60. I can hold my head up and say that I am not costing Poole council a penny for my 'bus pass. I don't have one and I never will!
All my friends have said to me "where's your 'bus pass"? They all have cars, as do I . It seems to be seen as 'clever' to waste the country's money when you don't have to.
The day I have to get on a smelly, noisy, slow 'bus that goes when it wants to, not when I want to and where it wants to go not where I want to will be the day I give up on life.

DorsetEco, Christchurch says...
11:59pm Tue 10 Nov 09

I can hold my head up too Trooper2 and say I am sparing the roads from yet another car by using the buses. Buses are not as you describe, and will improve further the more they are used which is one of the reasons that there are bus pass for over 60’s. Not a free pass, a prepaid pass - we have paid for it in our taxes. Why not give yourself a break from your car and use the bus from time to time you will enjoy it and amaze your friends too. Good luck!

wayneofafcb, poole says...
11:21am Wed 11 Nov 09

Mike Pickering got it spot on right. SHOULDN'T HAVE SOLD THE BUS COMPANY IN THE FIRST PLACE. The few million the council got for the company, will soon be eaten up by this scheme.
But this seems part of Government and EU driven policy. Tax offices sold, and rented back, from private companies, costing billions extra long term.
Hospitals and schools built and rented from private companies, costing many times more than borrowing from banks. Banks which we own in many cases. Brilliant!!Aren't Tory/New Labour privitisation policies marvelous.

Splisha, bournemouth says...
8:13pm Fri 13 Nov 09

Im happy as a working tax payer to have free bus passes available to people over 60. My mum uses her pass all the time... since my dad passed away suddenly its ensures she has independance she needs. She loves the fact the bus has "Old People" on it (she is over 70 herself!) getting out and about and really enjoying their freedom. Personally, ( I know she wont read this ) mum was never a great driver when she used to drive regularly. since dad passed away she has seriously been considering driving again!!! its been about 15 years since she last did.... shes my mum and i cant tell her not to so Im so thankful although she has the option to drive, she chooses to use her bus pass instead! So I support free passes for over 60s!

Comments are closed on this article.


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »