Driver's excuse: Mobile phone? No, it's a prawn cracker... (From Thisisdorset)
When news happens send us your pictures, video and views. Text BE to 80360 or contact us by email
Bizarre explanations don't help 957 drivers caught under No Excuses campaign
1:00pm Thursday 17th May 2012 in News By Julie Magee
AMAZED: No Excuse project manager Brian Austin
DESPITE some bizarre explanations, there was No Excuse for 957 drivers caught flouting the law in Dorset during March.
From January 1 until March 31 more than 4,000 offences were detected by safety cameras and No Excuse team officers.
Almost 2,000 tickets were issued including 250 for distraction offences such as using a mobile phone, taking photos and using an IPod while driving.
No Excuse project manager Brian Austin said: “We are continually amazed at the thought process of some of the bad and inconsiderate drivers on Dorset’s roads.
“We still have drivers who show they have no concern for other road users and pedestrians.
“Academic studies have shown that slowed reactions caused by the distraction of using a mobile phone whilst driving are similar to those driving at the drink drive limit.
“Up to a quarter of those killed on Dorset’s roads in the past two years have been as a consequence of drink driving.”
He pledged to continue to use safety camera vans, marked and unmarked cars, bikes and technology such as concept lasers, which can detect offences from more than 400 metres, to “make a difference in Dorset.”
AND HERE'S SOME OF THEIR EXCUSES FOR BAD DRIVING
A woman caught using her mobile phone at the wheel in Purbeck insisted she had been eating a prawn cracker and didn’t have her phone with her. But when the officer dialled the number the phone rang in her car. She immediately apologised and offered the officer a prawn cracker. In return, she was given a ticket.
A Poole man caught using his mobile phone while driving, said: “Well I wouldn’t have used my mobile if I knew there were policemen in an unmarked car behind me.”
A driver stopped in Poole travelling at 50mph in a 40mph zone said: “I’m on my way to an eyesight test and didn’t see the speed limit sign.”
Comments(15)
MPK83i
says...
1:37pm Thu 17 May 12
Chugwater wrote:Bloody right,it seems that the ones I see tearing around never wear helmets.
I wish they'd do something about the chavvy little hooligans riding round on mopeds.
Won't be long before one of those little scumbags causes an accident.
Cordite
says...
1:39pm Thu 17 May 12
Chugwater wrote:Agree.....and those pesky mobility scooters aren't far behind!
I wish they'd do something about the chavvy little hooligans riding round on mopeds.
Won't be long before one of those little scumbags causes an accident.
Franks Tank
says...
1:41pm Thu 17 May 12
thevisitor
says...
2:06pm Thu 17 May 12
souwest
says...
2:16pm Thu 17 May 12
What about
"Sorry this is ambulance going to an accident"
"Police car going to a crime"
"Fire engine going to a fire"
"Olympic official going to the state brothel"
Wageslave
says...
2:47pm Thu 17 May 12
n4
says...
2:59pm Thu 17 May 12
peopleareidiots
says...
4:03pm Thu 17 May 12
derek_acorah
says...
4:34pm Thu 17 May 12
n4 wrote:'Where are the Police when you need them... '
And... The dangerous lunatics who try to go straight across the roundabout at Bear Cross from the right turn only lane (travelling North). You are thoughtless, selfish cretins who really should not be behind the wheel of a car/van. Or the individuals who go all the way round the roundabout to turn left or go North... Yes, you in the BMW... you know who you are.. You're a dangerout idiot. While we're on the subject... Motorcyclists who insist on driving between the two lanes of traffic on the Dorset Way... Where are the Police when you need them...
One would hope they'll be out catching real criminals. Oh, wait.....
The Renegade Master
says...
5:08pm Thu 17 May 12
Persecuting the motorist for petty offences and then dressing them up as being as bad as drink driving is shameful.
If distraction is so dangerous you'd best start banning people from talking in their cars too. Ban screaming kids, radios, changing a cd, smoking or even eating a sweet as well.
The only distraction crime here is the one that sees policemen chasing after the soft target motorist instead of catching real criminals.
tbpoole
says...
9:45pm Thu 17 May 12
The Renegade Master wrote:Nice to see that you have decided which laws are petty, or who are the real criminals - I bow to your expert opinion. In fact if you look up the research you will find that the distraction from mobile phone use can be equal to or worse than the effect of alcohol. If there is no threat of being punished drivers will just carry on regardless. Don't turn the argument around to justify your small minded views.
Congratulations to the Police and Dorset Road Safe for another successful period of revenue generation.
Persecuting the motorist for petty offences and then dressing them up as being as bad as drink driving is shameful.
If distraction is so dangerous you'd best start banning people from talking in their cars too. Ban screaming kids, radios, changing a cd, smoking or even eating a sweet as well.
The only distraction crime here is the one that sees policemen chasing after the soft target motorist instead of catching real criminals.
The Renegade Master
says...
10:45pm Thu 17 May 12
tbpoole wrote:I'm sorry that you're so naive that you can't see what the Police and Dorset Road Safe are really about.
The Renegade Master wrote:Nice to see that you have decided which laws are petty, or who are the real criminals - I bow to your expert opinion. In fact if you look up the research you will find that the distraction from mobile phone use can be equal to or worse than the effect of alcohol. If there is no threat of being punished drivers will just carry on regardless. Don't turn the argument around to justify your small minded views.
Congratulations to the Police and Dorset Road Safe for another successful period of revenue generation.
Persecuting the motorist for petty offences and then dressing them up as being as bad as drink driving is shameful.
If distraction is so dangerous you'd best start banning people from talking in their cars too. Ban screaming kids, radios, changing a cd, smoking or even eating a sweet as well.
The only distraction crime here is the one that sees policemen chasing after the soft target motorist instead of catching real criminals.
I'm not condoning using a mobile phone behind the wheel, just highlighting that there are many many other things that can distract a driver that aren't as easy for a policemen in an unmarked car to spot. That's why they focus on a small number of offences that are and concentrate their propaganda against those to justify their profit driven campaign against the motorist.
tbpoole
says...
7:34am Fri 18 May 12
The Renegade Master wrote:There are indeed many things that can distract you, and they can equally be taken into account if you cause an accident while doing them, the police are just targeting the things most likely to cause one. You seem to think that motorists are some sort of untouchable elite who know best.
tbpoole wrote:I'm sorry that you're so naive that you can't see what the Police and Dorset Road Safe are really about.
The Renegade Master wrote:Nice to see that you have decided which laws are petty, or who are the real criminals - I bow to your expert opinion. In fact if you look up the research you will find that the distraction from mobile phone use can be equal to or worse than the effect of alcohol. If there is no threat of being punished drivers will just carry on regardless. Don't turn the argument around to justify your small minded views.
Congratulations to the Police and Dorset Road Safe for another successful period of revenue generation.
Persecuting the motorist for petty offences and then dressing them up as being as bad as drink driving is shameful.
If distraction is so dangerous you'd best start banning people from talking in their cars too. Ban screaming kids, radios, changing a cd, smoking or even eating a sweet as well.
The only distraction crime here is the one that sees policemen chasing after the soft target motorist instead of catching real criminals.
I'm not condoning using a mobile phone behind the wheel, just highlighting that there are many many other things that can distract a driver that aren't as easy for a policemen in an unmarked car to spot. That's why they focus on a small number of offences that are and concentrate their propaganda against those to justify their profit driven campaign against the motorist.
The Liberal
says...
8:45am Fri 18 May 12
Chugwater says...
1:09pm Thu 17 May 12
Won't be long before one of those little scumbags causes an accident.