News RSS Feed


Borough council is among worst in country for providing affordable homes


THE borough council ranks among the worst in the country for delivering enough affordable homes to meet local need, a housing charity has found.

Shelter’s Housing League table, which is launched today, shows that Weymouth and Portland Borough Council is delivering seven per cent of the affordable homes that are needed.

It is ranked 284 out of 323 English local authorities for affordable housing delivery – 30 places behind West Dorset District Council, which in 254th place is meeting nine per cent of local needs. Purbeck District Council is ranked 197 and is meeting 15 per cent of the affordable homes that are needed.

Local authorities are responsible for identifying the housing need in their area and for ensuring enough affordable homes are provided to meet this need.

However, Shelter’s research has found that 76 councils, including Weymouth and Portland, are delivering 10 per cent or less of the number of homes they have identified are needed.

Shelter’s chief executive Campbell Robb said: “These figures are extremely worrying.

“With more than 3,345 households on the housing waiting list in Weymouth and Portland, the council must work far harder to ensure more desperately needed affordable homes are provided if it ever hopes to meet the housing needs of the local population.

“Independent experts commissioned by the council say 800 new affordable homes need to be built each year in Weymouth and Portland, but an average of only 57 have been delivered in the past year, leaving a shortfall of 743 homes per year.”

The findings are part of Shelter’s Housing League Table, a new one-stop-shop website that provides local housing data including house prices, housing waiting lists and levels of housing delivery.

The website also ranks councils according to their current levels of affordable housing delivery against their analysis of housing need.

Mr Robb added: “The recession has created a difficult climate for house building, but these figures clearly show that Weymouth and Portland Borough Council is struggling to provide enough affordable homes for those who need them.”

A spokesman for Weymouth and Portland Borough Council said: “It is unrealistic to expect the delivery of affordable housing to keep pace with the identified need.

“It is a small, constrained borough and opportunities for large scale development of affordable housing are limited. In fact only a small number of applications we receive each year reach the threshold to generate any social housing.”

l To view the rankings online visit the website shelter.org.uk/housingleaguetabledata

Comments(10)

Octave says...
12:52pm Fri 19 Mar 10

Quote...Mr Robb added: “The recession has created a difficult climate for house building, but these figures clearly show that Weymouth and Portland Borough Council is struggling to provide enough affordable homes for those who need them.”
I wouldnt blame the recession, Weymouth and Portland have never provided for the needs of Affordable Housing, they have always maintained an 'Im alright Jack Attitude' and cant really understand why everyone isnt rich...Time really for people who are employed by the council to do their job, as they are currently not fit for purpose, they treat their employment more like a job club...than the responsibility it entails...

FitterC says...
1:18pm Fri 19 Mar 10

The only people W&PBC care about are the second-home owners blighting the town and developers vying to build yet more luxury executive flats at exorbitant prices and offering a nice little earner on Council Tax. It is high time W&PBC started looking after the people who live here.

FitterC says...
1:22pm Fri 19 Mar 10

P.S. The council spokesman says there is no room to build affordable housing and most developments are not sufficiently large to require the developer to provide a proportion of social housing. Weasle words! There is room on the Pavilion site now that the grubby landsharks Howerd Holdings have crashed and W&PBC is able to set its own limits on the ratio of social housing.

likeitornot says...
2:07pm Fri 19 Mar 10

800 new homes a year and just where are they supposed to build these 800 houses every year, perhaps we could compete with Dubai and build the tallest block of flats in the world, the only way I can see of building even a fraction of these houses is by moving the boundaries outward or better still scrap W and P.B.C and become part of W.D.D.C. But 800 per year is a totally unrealistic figure given the geographical constraints of the area.

shy talk says...
2:56pm Fri 19 Mar 10

Could we not erect 800 prefabs per year? Subject to land availability. This helped solved the shortage of housing after the Second World War.

ianthejocko says...
3:58pm Fri 19 Mar 10

WPBC had sufficient affordable housing until Thatcher's Government introduced the "Right to Buy" Council properties and now the chickens have come home to roost.

Mabu says...
7:03pm Fri 19 Mar 10

Yes, Right to Buy is ridiculous in these times. Maybe back then it made sense. Not now, with the shortages.

weymouthfox says...
11:48pm Fri 19 Mar 10

I do not believe the council has done anything for affordable housing. What they did own, then called council houses, were transferred to Weymouth & Portland Housing some 15 years ago and the council lost interest. Councillors have narrow horizons, they will happily threaten dogowners who many have the wrong length lead or persecute cyclists for being on the seafront, but they have no vision. Is there any chance someone will oppose these poor thinkers at the May elections?

Tremendous Eddie Tremendouson says...
3:16pm Sat 20 Mar 10

The solution is blindingly obvious - expand the Borough boundaries considerably, assume Unitary Authority status, and build on the North and West areas of the existing urban area.

Sorry Chickerell, but you are going to have to become a formal part of the expanded Borough.

And in my opinion it is a fallacy that we should become part of WDDC as the two entities are entirley different (one urban, one rural), and both with entirely different needs.

BastardInBlack says...
8:15am Thu 25 Mar 10

Totally agree with you ianthejocko. Sales of council houses should never have been allowed. Just think on when you're voting in the next general election.


Malcolm Bridge, 30, and his fiancée Jackie Marriott, pictured with son Tyler, are renting a two-bedroomed house in Chickerell and have been on the council's housing waiting list for four years Malcolm Bridge, 30, and his fiancée Jackie Marriott, pictured with son Tyler, are renting a two-bedroomed house in Chickerell and have been on the council's housing waiting list for four years

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses