News RSS Feed


South Dorset MP defends £6k union donation


SOUTH Dorset MP Jim Knight has defended the £6,560 given to his constituency party by the Unite union.

The Employment Minister is said to have received the donations since the third quarter of 2005, according to figures released by the Conservatives.

Mr Knight is among 13 Cabinet ministers, including Gordon Brown and Ed Balls, whose constituency parties have received £33,042.38 of Unite funding since the third quarter of 2005. Mr Knight is reported to have received more than any of his colleagues.

This week the Conservatives published a dossier, which they say lays bare how Unite political officer Charlie Whelan – Mr Brown’s former spin doctor – is now ‘controlling’ Labour politicians, policies and the party’s election campaign.

The union, which is behind the British Airways planned four-day strike at Easter, is believed to have donated 25 per cent – £11million – of Labour’s income over four years.

Mr Knight said: “I actually don’t know how much they’ve given my constituency party, I don’t handle any of the money.

“Obviously I know we get donations from Unite among others and I’m grateful for that, particularly because those donations come from members of trade unions.

“Many of them choose to pay an addition on their subscription called the political levy, which they vote on regularly to choose which political party to support.

“So if Unite are giving a lot of money to support my constituency, which they are, that’s money from many ordinary working people within and outside the constituency who want a Labour voice in Dorset and in Parliament.”

The Conservative dossier claims the union’s influence on the Labour Party has ‘watered-down’ public services reforms, including ditched plans for the part-privatisation of the Royal Mail, freezing voluntary groups, charities and private providers out of providing NHS services and welfare reform plans.

Labour has also been criticised for not condemning the union for its role in the proposed BA strike.

Mr Knight said: “It’s total nonsense.

“This government has been taking a firm line about the BA strike – we don’t think it’s the right thing to happen.

“I don’t think any other Government in history has been more pragmatic and practical about using the private sector where we think it will improve public services.

“This is just a smokescreen to distract from the fact that the Conservative donor Lord Ashcroft gave £29,000 to the South Dorset Conservative candidate Ed Matts at the 2005 election to try and claim my seat, which happily failed.

“I don’t know how much he’ll be donating this time.

“It’s much more worrying when donations are from somebody who doesn’t pay tax in this country – despite promising to when he was made a member of the House of Lords 10 years ago.

“That’s much more concerning than trade union members trying to support the Labour Party.”


Your Say YourDorset

585, Weymouth says...
2:17pm Thu 18 Mar 10

The money should have gone to improve the conditions for the members of the unions not these hangers-on.

biggestoaf, Weymouth says...
2:49pm Thu 18 Mar 10

@ 585
Presumably the members of the unions recognise their working conditions are likely to be better protected under a Labour government than under a Conservative one and therefore choose to support Labour candidates? Seems very sensible to me.

Duckorange, Wyke Regis says...
3:35pm Thu 18 Mar 10

Let's not forget the £29,000 given by Lord Ashcroft to local Tories in their attempt to unseat Jim Knight at the last election. That was money well spent, wasn't it? Bet *that's* not in the Conservative dossier.
Moral: They're all at it

niblick, Dorchester says...
3:51pm Thu 18 Mar 10

Duckorange wrote:
Let's not forget the £29,000 given by Lord Ashcroft to local Tories in their attempt to unseat Jim Knight at the last election. That was money well spent, wasn't it? Bet *that's* not in the Conservative dossier. Moral: They're all at it
Of course they are, how any party can claim moral high ground over another is laughable they are all in the pocket of either unions or wealthy businessmen, they don't serve us they serve their benefactors.

likeitornot, Portland says...
3:57pm Thu 18 Mar 10

The Tories are funded by big business and the Labour party are funded by the workers via union dues so I don’t see the problem both parties are influenced by external pressures, until we can devise a better method of funding our political parties we have no choice but to stick with it.What I find disgusting is the fact that our M.Ps etc are allowed to belong to unions when other sectors of society are not allowed to belong to a union, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

likeitornot, Portland says...
4:01pm Thu 18 Mar 10

niblick wrote:
Jim Knight talks out of his arse.
I hope he doesn't spit then.

niblick, Dorchester says...
4:02pm Thu 18 Mar 10

likeitornot wrote:
The Tories are funded by big business and the Labour party are funded by the workers via union dues so I don’t see the problem both parties are influenced by external pressures, until we can devise a better method of funding our political parties we have no choice but to stick with it.What I find disgusting is the fact that our M.Ps etc are allowed to belong to unions when other sectors of society are not allowed to belong to a union, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
The problem is it greatly increases the risk of corruption any decision made is tainted, is the decision made for the good of the people or their benefactors.

CHEVAL, Weymouth says...
5:17pm Thu 18 Mar 10

You may not have long to wait,tho I'm not keen on your turn of phrase.

FitterC, Weymouth says...
6:25pm Thu 18 Mar 10

If there was ever an MP to be trusted to spend wisely donations of whatever size in the service of his constituents, it is Jim Knight. Jim has worked very hard for South Dorset and has taken a very pro-active role in resolving local issues. The possibility of his being replaced by the Tory land baron, Richard Grosvenor Plunkett-Ernle-Erle-
Drax, beloved of the County Set, detached from the peasants (sorry, people), is one I would rather not contemplate.

FitterC, Weymouth says...
6:25pm Thu 18 Mar 10

If there was ever an MP to be trusted to spend wisely donations of whatever size in the service of his constituents, it is Jim Knight. Jim has worked very hard for South Dorset and has taken a very pro-active role in resolving local issues. The possibility of his being replaced by the Tory land baron, Richard Grosvenor Plunkett-Ernle-Erle-
Drax, beloved of the County Set, detached from the peasants (sorry, people), is one I would rather not contemplate.

franchise, weymouth says...
7:24pm Thu 18 Mar 10

There should be a union for votors where we could go on strike if we were not happy with our MP!!!! Mr.Knight is part of this government. Apart from the expenses scandal now he has financial gain from Unite.
This election is going to be very difficult. The public in general are sick to death of the lot of them. Perhaps we should give someone new a chance. Couldn't be as bad as it is now.

niblick, Dorchester says...
7:30pm Thu 18 Mar 10

Bring back the Monster Raving Looney Party, oh I forgot they are already in power.

FitterC, Weymouth says...
10:27pm Thu 18 Mar 10

@franchise

I think you will find that the word you are looking for is "voters".

Money donated to constituency MPs of any party is not for the MPs personal use, but for spending on constituency business. Jim Knight has always published his expenses in full on his website and they have thus always been available for public scrutiny.

It is incontrovertible that Jim Knight has been an exemplary MP in the service of the people of South Dorset.

franchise, weymouth says...
9:55am Fri 19 Mar 10

FitterC. What a condescending post.
Slip of the finger needs your correcting. Yes, Mr. K. published his expenses with just a few discrepancies like many others. In view of spending this money on constituency business, what is the difference between Unite and Ashcroft.
Both targeting, in any way they can,
vulnerable seats.
What we need is not just an MP and his services to the local population but his genuine ethical voting in Parliament for the good of the land.
We all have a right to our own opinions and your use of the words "incontrovertible and exemplary" just do not coincide with my own.

FitterC, Weymouth says...
12:18pm Fri 19 Mar 10

@franchise: If you wish to have as an MP an old Etonian who has publicly stated his intention to spend no more than two days a week on Parliamentary duties, but three days a week tending to 7,000 acre estate, that is your democratic right. I would merely point out that Jim Knight regulary clocks up an 80hr week in the service of his constituents. Personally I would rather have an MP who took the job seriously and performed it professionally.

585, Weymouth says...
12:36pm Fri 19 Mar 10

FitterC, sounds like you either work for Jim or need to have a lot of 'I Luv Jim' leaflets printed (:o))

daddykingcool, Dorchester says...
2:35pm Fri 19 Mar 10

Do people actually still join unions? Complete waste of time I say! They stir up trouble simply to justify their existance and membership costs.

franchise, weymouth says...
4:07pm Fri 19 Mar 10

I too cannot understand the use of Unions today or at least the power that they hold. There are so many laws and ways to defend yourself if you are an employee. Employers really do have to toe the line. In the present financial crisis I must admit I would be happy to have a job and an income and not rock the boat. In reply to FitterC. Your statement regarding my choice of Mr.D is highly presumtious. All I know of him is that he was for many years fighting for his country. Something that none of our politicians know a jot about and if they did, would not have voted to be in Iraq or Afganistan now using our young men's lives as they are.

FitterC, Weymouth says...
4:41pm Fri 19 Mar 10

As much as i admire and respect our service men and women, some of whom number amongst my current friends, and alongside whom I myself served, I cannot commend any PPC on the basis of whether or not they "fought for their country". Richard Drax served three tours in Northern Ireland, for the record. I do however judge them on their ability. I do not wear an "I love Jim" sticker. I take a deep interest in local and national politics and if any person pays the slightest regard to the local and national press, they cannot but help notice Jim Knight's very prominent and effective role in campaigning for his constituent's interests. If you would like to talk to Jim Knight on any issue, you can call his constituency office, write to at the same or at his Parliamentary address, or you can talk to him directly on Facebook or Twitter. Richard Drax is somewhat harder to pin down and I am still awaiting replies to various questions I have put to him.

Dispirited, Weymouth says...
9:04am Sun 21 Mar 10

I do not wish to get into a debate of the rights or wrongs of money being given to Jim Knight from Unite to aid his campaign. However it has been reported nationally that eighteen million pounds is given by the treasury to Unite of which 11 million is given back to the Labour Party. This cannot be right. This is tax payers money and would be better spent in supplying the correct resources to our troops.

franchise, weymouth says...
7:25pm Sun 21 Mar 10

Labour MPs are evidently going to take part in a Commons strike on Budget Day to support industrial action by civil servants.
These are the orders of one of Britain's biggest unions, Labour MPs will refuse to cross a picket line at Westminster on Wednesday, while some will shut down their Commons offices to show their solidarity with the strikers.


http://www.dailymail
.co.uk/news/article-
1259547/New-row-Labo
ur-union-links-MPs-j
oin-Budget-Day-strik
e.html#ixzz0iqBSYuDf

585, Weymouth says...
10:07am Mon 22 Mar 10

Labour MPs are evidently going to take part in a Commons strike - will we notice this?

Scolopax, Wyke Regis says...
6:42pm Mon 22 Mar 10

Daddycool and Franchise, your comments on union membership are extremely naive, I hope the day never comes when you need union support.

Leccy, Portland says...
8:25pm Tue 23 Mar 10

daddykingcool wrote:
Do people actually still join unions? Complete waste of time I say! They stir up trouble simply to justify their existance and membership costs.
Do you actually know anything of what unions do for employees. Long gone are the days of the mass walk out at the car plants etc, and it's good to.Todays unions provide employees with many benefits and are not there to incite trouble,but to provide support and advice for their members. Yes there may be some militant groups but they are few a far between these days.I for one pay my dues and would not be any other way.

Comments are closed on this article.

SOUTH Dorset MP Jim Knight has defended the £6,560 given to his constituency party by the Unite union. SOUTH Dorset MP Jim Knight has defended the £6,560 given to his constituency party by the Unite union.

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »