News RSS Feed


Olympic Village in Osprey Quay to house 2012 sailors


AN Olympic Village to house sailors for the 2012 games is to spring up on Portland.

Organisers today confirmed that the Sailing community will be based at a new development being built at Officer’s Field on Osprey Quay.

It was originally planned to base all the athletes on a cruise liner moored in Weymouth Bay, but organisers turned their attention to land-based facilities after competitors raised concerns about being cooped up on a ship.

The 14-day Olympic sailing competition in July and August 2012 will involve approximately 700 sailors, coaches and officials. The six-day Paralympic sailing competition in August and September will require less than half that number to be housed.

The Olympic Village will house up to 400 international athletes for the sailing events. However, around 500 to 600 bedrooms will be needed to house the competitors and officials.

The news does not affect British athletes, who will be accommodated at the new Royal Yachting Association’s (RYA) Portland House training centre at Osprey Quay – part of the £30million Castle Court development.

Many Olympic sailors such as Nick and Sarah Dempsey, Paul Goodison and Saskia Clark have their own homes in the borough.

Developer ZeroC Holdings is building 77 two, three and four-bedroom low carbon homes in partnership with the South West Regional Development Agency, the owner of the land on Portland.

A spokesman for the London 2012 Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) said the development was selected following an assessment of accommodation options around the wider Weymouth and Portland area to find the best possible housing for competitors and their support teams.

The development is within close proximity to the Weymouth and Portland National Sailing Academy, where the events will be based, and adjacent to Portland Marina.

LOCOG chairman Sebastian Coe said: “This development offers consistency with the standards being achieved in the main Athletes Village in Stratford, and will be a great home for the athletes.

“We are confident that making temporary use of a permanent facility which is very much part of the impressive regeneration of Portland is the right solution for athletes and for Portland in the long-term.”

Kim Slowe, managing director of ZeroC Holdings, added: “The Games will bring excellent facilities and much-needed investment to the area. The housing is located next to world-class leisure facilities and stunning coastal scenery.”

James Watts, development manager at the South West RDA with responsibility for Osprey Quay, said: “The RDA is investing more than £40million in Osprey Quay to make it a magnet for private sector investment, creating around 1,400 jobs by 2016.

“We’re delighted that this exemplar low carbon development will be a temporary home to teams from around the world and then a permanent asset for the local community.”


Your Say YourDorset

Get a grip, Dorset says...
11:28am Mon 8 Feb 10

Sorry Portland you have been shafted by SWERDA

popup, portland says...
12:11pm Mon 8 Feb 10

Now all becomes clear like Get a grip says we have been shafted again, we now know why South West Regional Development Agency were so insistent that the officers field development went ahead. One as to ask are all government departments lies thieves and cheats, from the top to the bottom we are fed lies, is it any wonder the country is in the state it’s in. And still people keep trying to tell us about the great Olympic legacy which is nothing but a big con.

Duckorange, Wyke Regis says...
12:41pm Mon 8 Feb 10

Sorry, I've not been paying attention. Could somebody explain - in short words for the hard of thinking - why Portland's been 'shafted' on this?
.
Not challenging anyone's views, just like to know what the issue is.

popup, portland says...
1:43pm Mon 8 Feb 10

As the only remaining flat ground in Underhill Officers Field was our sports ground and the building on the land was almost if not entirely opposed too by the residents of Portland, if you look at what they have built so far they are an eyesore already (to high/too close to the road) and totally out of character for the island. That said if any housing had to be built it should have been social housing for local people. But now we know the truth all that remains is for the Weymouth and Portland Olympic Village signs to go up and the big con trick rolls on.

Get a grip, Dorset says...
2:15pm Mon 8 Feb 10

Dear Duckorange

Popup has it correct and in a form for the hard of thinking.

Portlanders have been taken to the cleaners.

lucycoop, portland says...
3:55pm Mon 8 Feb 10

i thought these were for local people. So now these houses are going to sit empty waiting for 2012 why local families are waiting to buy affordable housing. Should of left it as a playfield. About time someone started listening to what us portlanders want on our island.

maximan, says...
4:09pm Mon 8 Feb 10

Affordable housing.....mmmm....
If the average wage in the Weyport area is £20k per annum and a mortgage is 3.5 times that, these should be going for £70k. Never in the history have so many been owed so much by so few.

Duckorange, Wyke Regis says...
4:21pm Mon 8 Feb 10

Yup, you've been screwed over.
.
And of course they'll be sold on as premium housing with sea views after the Games.

Dispirited, Weymouth says...
4:29pm Mon 8 Feb 10

Are these houses going to sit empty until 2012? If yes, then it is disgrace with so many local people wanting homes. When the Olympics is over will they be sold at affordable prices?
Bearing in mind that the average wage in W and P is £20k, and most people I know earn £13k to £14k, will they be sold at prices that equate to local wages?. I think local people are entitled to some answers regarding these properties it is not good enough to say they are for an Olympic village. Lets hear from the powers that be what is to become of them afterwards.

Get a grip, Dorset says...
4:45pm Mon 8 Feb 10

Portlanders have been sold down the river for the Olympics.

I predict that come the day they will be totally ignored.

Sorry you have to blame your councillors who have been out – manoeuvred.

Ramonesman, Castletown says...
5:11pm Mon 8 Feb 10

So 700 athletes, coaches and officials in total, 400 in the Olympic Village - what happens to the other 300? I can see a nice Olympic Camp Site on the horizon.

Leccy, Portland says...
7:36pm Mon 8 Feb 10

When SWRDA first arrived on the Old Air Station they said no we're not going to build a whole load of houses because our remit is regeneration of jobs!!
Next outline planning goes in for 30 houses on the Officers field site, the town council objected. The Borough council passed it. Then they applied for permission to exit onto Victory Road, same out come as before. Once again they went back to the council to increase the amount of properties and guess what happened AGAIN!!

Get a grip, Dorset says...
8:48pm Mon 8 Feb 10

The Olympics are too big for local interest to stand in the way.

Tike, Weymouth says...
9:42pm Mon 8 Feb 10

"Competitors raised concerns about being cooped up on a ship". This is the sailing aspect of the Olympics isn't it? Hilarious!

PortlandWilliam, Dorchester says...
10:01pm Mon 8 Feb 10

Oh dear, people didn't really think 2012 was about sport did they.
Same as the CrossRail, Millenium Dome, and others, these projects are about regeneration, property development and job creation (and then mostly for the building industry and architects)

bluecat, Weymouth says...
9:59am Tue 9 Feb 10

Not a word in the report about will happen to these houses after the TWENTY ONE DAYS of events.

They should all be donated for local social housing ... but will that hapen?

We are all being conned by the Olympics featuring an absurdly unfriendly spectator sport.

Genghis, Portland says...
10:33am Tue 9 Feb 10

popup wrote:
As the only remaining flat ground in Underhill Officers Field was our sports ground and the building on the land was almost if not entirely opposed too by the residents of Portland, if you look at what they have built so far they are an eyesore already (to high/too close to the road) and totally out of character for the island. That said if any housing had to be built it should have been social housing for local people. But now we know the truth all that remains is for the Weymouth and Portland Olympic Village signs to go up and the big con trick rolls on.
I think the developers can be criticised for most things to do with this development. The loss of Officers' Field, cramming in too many houses on the site and then of course the lies about the eventual use of the housing/site. But out of character for the island? Just running my thoughts round the old stone cottages all round the island and the estates at Furlands, Courtlands etc, Verne Common Road and East Weare Road. Hardly a single Portland wide style is it. Of course there is the luxury of Victoria Square. Then I would have to agree with you. These new buildings are totally out of sync with that.

popup, portland says...
12:10pm Tue 9 Feb 10

Genghis wrote:
popup wrote: As the only remaining flat ground in Underhill Officers Field was our sports ground and the building on the land was almost if not entirely opposed too by the residents of Portland, if you look at what they have built so far they are an eyesore already (to high/too close to the road) and totally out of character for the island. That said if any housing had to be built it should have been social housing for local people. But now we know the truth all that remains is for the Weymouth and Portland Olympic Village signs to go up and the big con trick rolls on.
I think the developers can be criticised for most things to do with this development. The loss of Officers' Field, cramming in too many houses on the site and then of course the lies about the eventual use of the housing/site. But out of character for the island? Just running my thoughts round the old stone cottages all round the island and the estates at Furlands, Courtlands etc, Verne Common Road and East Weare Road. Hardly a single Portland wide style is it. Of course there is the luxury of Victoria Square. Then I would have to agree with you. These new buildings are totally out of sync with that.
My point was that as they are on the main road onto the island they could (should) have represented the island better and been more of a showpiece instead of being what looks like the slums of the future. With the possible exception of the Vicky Lodge or whatever they call it nowadays the whole of that side of the square should be demolished and a nice development could have been built that the whole island could have been proud of, after all its the first thing people see when they come onto the island instead they see a collection of grotty buildings and a rubbish yard.

Lulotte, Portland says...
1:47pm Tue 9 Feb 10

Permanent asset my arse!!!

Genghis, Portland says...
8:43pm Tue 9 Feb 10

popup wrote:
Genghis wrote:
popup wrote: As the only remaining flat ground in Underhill Officers Field was our sports ground and the building on the land was almost if not entirely opposed too by the residents of Portland, if you look at what they have built so far they are an eyesore already (to high/too close to the road) and totally out of character for the island. That said if any housing had to be built it should have been social housing for local people. But now we know the truth all that remains is for the Weymouth and Portland Olympic Village signs to go up and the big con trick rolls on.
I think the developers can be criticised for most things to do with this development. The loss of Officers' Field, cramming in too many houses on the site and then of course the lies about the eventual use of the housing/site. But out of character for the island? Just running my thoughts round the old stone cottages all round the island and the estates at Furlands, Courtlands etc, Verne Common Road and East Weare Road. Hardly a single Portland wide style is it. Of course there is the luxury of Victoria Square. Then I would have to agree with you. These new buildings are totally out of sync with that.
My point was that as they are on the main road onto the island they could (should) have represented the island better and been more of a showpiece instead of being what looks like the slums of the future. With the possible exception of the Vicky Lodge or whatever they call it nowadays the whole of that side of the square should be demolished and a nice development could have been built that the whole island could have been proud of, after all its the first thing people see when they come onto the island instead they see a collection of grotty buildings and a rubbish yard.
They haven't been finished yet so I can't comment on how they will look. Yes a few are close to the road as are the vast majority of houses in Fortuneswell. Too high? So are some of the buildings elsewhere on the Portland. But, in my opinion, even half built they still look far better than Victoria Square.
However the main complaint should be are those in power going to let them get away with the pack of lies they told in getting this development under way in the first place? I don't think we should hold our breath though as the answer will be yes, they will be allowed to get away with it.

Scolopax, Wyke Regis says...
7:08am Thu 11 Feb 10

Suggest anyone takes a look at the Zero C website to see who's behind this development...John Gummer, remember him?

Comments are closed on this article.

Work begins on the Olympic Village in Officer's Field on Portland Work begins on the Olympic Village in Officer's Field on Portland

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »