News RSS Feed


SAVAGED PET WAS PROTECTING TODDLER


A GRANDMOTHER whose dog was killed during a horrific attack by a Staffordshire bull terrier cross believes her dog died protecting her 15-month-old grandson.

Carol Pimperton, 51, says miniature Yorkshire terrier Spike got between the black bull terrier and her grandson Alfie as the youngster toddled towards it on the playing field at Fernheath Road, West Howe in Bournemouth.

The bull terrier, which was on a lead, lunged at Spike, grabbed him in its jaws and shook him around like a ragdoll during the 15-minute long attack.

Despite the desperate attempts of passers-by to rescue two-year-old Spike he died at the scene.

A vet’s examination later found that the terrier’s chest, lungs and neck had been punctured and his back broken.

Sobbing Carol told the Echo that she, husband Andrew, 52, an unemployed HGV driver, and a friend Ruby Sherwood, 19, had been standing together on the field chatting as their dogs played together and little Alfie kicked a football around.

They saw the bull terrier approaching with its owner, who had it on a lead. The dogs greeted each other with tails wagging and little Alfie began to toddle across to them.

Carol said: “If it hadn’t been my dog it would have been my grandson. It’s almost as if Spike knew what was going to happen. He protected him like he always has done if he thinks he’s in danger.

“Spike got between them. There was no growling and no teeth showing. The dog just turned so quickly.

“He got Spike around the neck and chest. He was shaking him around like a ragdoll. I was screaming and other people were trying to get him off.

“All this time my grandson was watching. I just picked him up and turned his face away. I’ve never seen anything so traumatic in my whole life. I don’t think I’ve slept properly since.”

The bull terrier eventually dropped Spike on the floor and police were called.

Little Alfie, who considered Spike his best friend, keeps asking for him, added the couple.

Carol added: “What’s to say it’s not going to happen again? Next time it might not be a dog. It might be a child.”

Rob White, head of Regulatory Services, said that its dog wardens will continue to patrol the area to ensure the dog owner is complying with its requirement to muzzle his dog and keep it on a lead at all times when in public.


Comments(16)

poolebabe says...
9:47am Sat 4 Jul 09

Tricky to have an opinion now. :/ It goes without saying this is tragic, and it is very sad an unfortunate the little Yorkshire terrier died. My biggest bug bare is dogs like bull terriers off lead, but the dog was on the lead. Should have been muzzled if dangerous, but the dog was on a lead. It does seem likely now the Yorkshire terrier, obviously off lead, was agressive to the bull terrier. The child is a serious issue indeed. But any parent with a small child in a dog walking area should bear that in mind that not all dogs are friendly or like children and a parent also has a duty to ensure the safety of a small child also. Common sense to approach any on lead dog with caution. Reading this story, the bull terrier did not seem threatning, but became threatened by the yorkshire terrier and reacted. Unfortunate, but a lesson to everyone involved. Thank goodness it wasn't the child, but it wasn't. We cannot second guess the intentions of the dogs either way, just because there was a child present. Don't mean to sound harsh about it, but my opinion has changed slightly about this story. At first I assumed the bull terrier was off lead. It wasn't. So it becomes a different issue for me.

RageAgainstTheMachine says...
10:19am Sat 4 Jul 09

Thankyou Echo for finally printing the fact that the SBT X was on a lead.

r50mini says...
10:50am Sat 4 Jul 09

Dogs are protective animals. My Jack Russel is protective of my wife and behaves differently to other dog's when they come up to her and when they come up to me. Some times he can be all happy and play and then occasionally few harsh words are said between the 2, there is no telling. If I am at all unsure he goes on the lead when other dogs approach and also if the other dog is with children. If I see the other dog on a lead then so does mine. It annoys me when I put mine on a lead and other owners just leave theirs off and then it runs up to us, with dogs being protective it is sometimes asking for trouble. Dog Owners need to understand the animals that they are responsible for. In this case I feel sorry for the owner of the SBT as they get enough bad press and the owner was being responsible by keeping their dog on the lead so they could control it.

KLH says...
12:08pm Sat 4 Jul 09

I used to have a German Shepherd as a teenager in the 70s, and he went up to a child in a pushchair and licked his face. I was mortified, I think the kid had remnants of something foodwise around its mouth, and my dog decided he'd lick it off. But when it came to other dogs, it was 50/50 what he'd do - there was a male labrador cross living across the road and they hated each other, they'd tear each other limb from limb if they got the chance! Yet another local dog, a male spaniel, he used to play with. You can never be too careful with dogs, any breed.

golden mouldie says...
2:23pm Sat 4 Jul 09

If both dogs had been on a lead, then nothing would have happened.

MJD says...
3:10pm Sat 4 Jul 09

Don't blame the dog blame the owner.

RageAgainstTheMachine says...
3:27pm Sat 4 Jul 09

golden mouldie wrote:
If both dogs had been on a lead, then nothing would have happened.
Totally agree,forward thinking and common sense.Outcome total prevention.
I dont blame the owner,as this was a situation that unfortunately happened,however the owner of the SBT X now has to live with the fact of what his much loved pet did,not a nice thought for anyone is it.

poolebabe says...
4:58pm Sat 4 Jul 09

RageAgainstTheMachin
e
wrote:
golden mouldie wrote: If both dogs had been on a lead, then nothing would have happened.
Totally agree,forward thinking and common sense.Outcome total prevention. I dont blame the owner,as this was a situation that unfortunately happened,however the owner of the SBT X now has to live with the fact of what his much loved pet did,not a nice thought for anyone is it.
Totally agree with that. So sad for everyone involved.

harriet.ox@live.com says...
8:32pm Sat 4 Jul 09

poolebabe, poole says...
4:58pm Sat 4 Jul 09
RageAgainstTheMachin

e wrote:

golden mouldie wrote: If both dogs had been on a lead, then nothing would have happened.
Totally agree,forward thinking and common sense.Outcome total prevention. I dont blame the owner,as this was a situation that unfortunately happened,however the owner of the SBT X now has to live with the fact of what his much loved pet did,not a nice thought for anyone is it.
Totally agree with that. So sad for everyone involved.
RageAgainstTheMachin e wrote:
golden mouldie wrote: If both dogs had been on a lead, then nothing would have happened.
Totally agree,forward thinking and common sense.Outcome total prevention. I dont blame the owner,as this was a situation that unfortunately happened,however the owner of the SBT X now has to live with the fact of what his much loved pet did,not a nice thought for anyone is it.
Totally agree with that. So sad for everyone involved.


Not nesserselry not everythings black and white ya no,, open your mind a bit guys ! jeees

poolebabe says...
9:07pm Sat 4 Jul 09

I know that Harriet. My mind is wide open thank you. Nothing is ever straight forward especially when only hearing one side of the story. Not sticking up for the Bull terrier at all, but it is a sad situation is it not? I am not sure what your point is? What's not "black and white" in your eyes? If both dogs were on a lead would this have happened? Should a 15 month old baby be left to wander off towards an unknown dog on a lead? So you are right it's not black and white!

RageAgainstTheMachine says...
9:10pm Sat 4 Jul 09

harriet.ox@live.com wrote:
poolebabe, poole says... 4:58pm Sat 4 Jul 09 RageAgainstTheMachin e wrote: golden mouldie wrote: If both dogs had been on a lead, then nothing would have happened. Totally agree,forward thinking and common sense.Outcome total prevention. I dont blame the owner,as this was a situation that unfortunately happened,however the owner of the SBT X now has to live with the fact of what his much loved pet did,not a nice thought for anyone is it. Totally agree with that. So sad for everyone involved.
RageAgainstTheMachin e wrote:
golden mouldie wrote: If both dogs had been on a lead, then nothing would have happened.
Totally agree,forward thinking and common sense.Outcome total prevention. I dont blame the owner,as this was a situation that unfortunately happened,however the owner of the SBT X now has to live with the fact of what his much loved pet did,not a nice thought for anyone is it.
Totally agree with that. So sad for everyone involved. Not nesserselry not everythings black and white ya no,, open your mind a bit guys ! jeees
My mind is open,thankyou very much.When this story broke,straight away the majority of comments,were from people that were straight on the offence due to the fact the dog was a SBT X.Now the fact the SBT X WAS on a lead,the comments today are completely opposite.So when the whole picture immerges it is black & white for me

1984vicki says...
8:35pm Sun 5 Jul 09

I have got to say reading this I'm fuming!! Firstly...I have had staffordshire bull terriers for 10 years now. I have a 7 year old daughter that has been brough up rolling around on the floor with them and have enjoyed every second of it. ..Now, reading this I'm actually having trouble trying to figure out exactly where you think you have the right to blame the dog OR it's owner. The dog WAS on a lead...yours wasn't...you obviously weren't looking very hard at your grandson unless you make a habit of him running up to dogs he doesn't know. I know my daughter has been brought up to ASK if she wants to stroke a dog!! And finally...where exactly is the proof that this dog was going to attack the child?? All the dog knew was that it was on a lead and some snappy little dog was showing it aggression. I'm not condoning the fact that this staff killed your dog...but maybe you'll think more carefully in future about letting kids run up to strange dogs. I DO NOT blame the owner or the dog. It was on a lead, which shows that this person is responsible enough to realise that his dog might get funny with other dogs and did something about it. Yes, you lost your dog...but where was your lead?? Staffordshire bull terriers are very loving and compassionate dogs and for you to use YOUR mistake against the breed is wrong!

williamsolo says...
7:23am Mon 6 Jul 09

i hope the staffs owner got brought to court,he must have known the temperment of his dog, so deserves a lesson

1984vicki says...
9:39am Mon 6 Jul 09

William...what a load of rubbish. He was doing the right thing, walking his dog on a lead. I'm sorry but why should he go to court. She should have been watching her dog and grandson. Sorry but this family is not getting the sypathy vote from me, simply because there's no evidence whatsoever that this dog was going to bite the child. You're all doing what you always do...maximising a story about a staff to make it lookm bad....Not a chance!! This one is no way the owers fault. God this infuriates me! U know what. This whole story is absolutely pathetic! So what...your dog got killed. Perhaps if it was on a lead in the first place it would be here now. This is the womans fault, the ones whose dog died. SSo stop with blaming the other dog. This is stupid. You know what...I'm sick of hearing about it. WHY WAS THE CHILD WALKING TOWARDS THE DOG ON IT'S OWN?? WHY WASN'T THE OTHER DOG ON A LEAD...AND WHY WASN'T ANYONE WATCHING EITHER OF THEM? You brought it on yourself now leave the staffies alone. Ur truly patheic and you don't deserve to be a dog owner as you're obviously not responsible enough. It's people like you that give the staffs a bad name. So if they're so terrible...why is it that I have NEVER been bitten by any of mine and I know plenty of people that can say the same. My child has never been bitten either. So stop with all this bs about it eh...when we all know that smaller dogs are yappy, mouthy litte buggers anyway. Maybe the little dogs realised now that little man syndrome wont get you anywhere

poolebabe says...
10:11am Mon 6 Jul 09

1984vicki wrote:
William...what a load of rubbish. He was doing the right thing, walking his dog on a lead. I'm sorry but why should he go to court. She should have been watching her dog and grandson. Sorry but this family is not getting the sypathy vote from me, simply because there's no evidence whatsoever that this dog was going to bite the child. You're all doing what you always do...maximising a story about a staff to make it lookm bad....Not a chance!! This one is no way the owers fault. God this infuriates me! U know what. This whole story is absolutely pathetic! So what...your dog got killed. Perhaps if it was on a lead in the first place it would be here now. This is the womans fault, the ones whose dog died. SSo stop with blaming the other dog. This is stupid. You know what...I'm sick of hearing about it. WHY WAS THE CHILD WALKING TOWARDS THE DOG ON IT'S OWN?? WHY WASN'T THE OTHER DOG ON A LEAD...AND WHY WASN'T ANYONE WATCHING EITHER OF THEM? You brought it on yourself now leave the staffies alone. Ur truly patheic and you don't deserve to be a dog owner as you're obviously not responsible enough. It's people like you that give the staffs a bad name. So if they're so terrible...why is it that I have NEVER been bitten by any of mine and I know plenty of people that can say the same. My child has never been bitten either. So stop with all this bs about it eh...when we all know that smaller dogs are yappy, mouthy litte buggers anyway. Maybe the little dogs realised now that little man syndrome wont get you anywhere
I do agree with most of what you say. However, you cannot tar all little dogs with the same brush as much as Staffies cannot be tied with the same brush. As for small dog syndrome, does a mouthy 5yr old child deserve to be beaten up by a teenager just because they are mouthy? I am sorry, but whilst I do agree with most of what you say, your comments about small dogs only fuel the flame. Big dogs, small dogs and everything in between are the products of their owners. Staffies get a tough deal because they are often bought by people wanting a "hard dog" They get a tough deal because if and when a Staffy does bite, it is not a playful nip, it is lethal. Small dogs, whilst they may be yappy are not in the news for killing and mauling, because they can't in anywhere near the same league as a Staffy. That's why Staffies get the bad press, along with Alsations, Dobermans and Rotties in the past. When was the last time you saw in the paper a child or another dog being savaged or killed by a yorkshire terrier?? Just because your Staffy is ok, you cannot close your eyes to the potential dangers of other Staffies that have not had the proper training.

1984vicki says...
3:53pm Mon 6 Jul 09

No, I agree. A dog does need proper training and I'm not talking for all staffies. But either way this dog owner had a dog on a lead and maybe if the other dog was, it would still be here today. And as I said before...there was no proof whatsoever that this dog was going to bite the child. It's pathetic


Spike: tried to protect baby Alfie Spike: tried to protect baby Alfie

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses