News RSS Feed


20mph limit plan agreed for village

3:00pm Saturday 8th March 2008

comment Comments (7)   Have your say »


PLANS to impose 20mph speed limits on residential roads in Burton have been agreed by Christchurch Borough Council's community services committee.

Now, following two recent incidents in which vehicles damaged a wall and a house front, Cllr Ray Nottage has called for a similar speed limits in two busy narrow roads in his ward.

"I would be delighted if we could extend this to other village areas such as Purewell and Stanpit," he said.

The council's transportation and highways manager Bob Baker had earlier told the committee that there had been only six objectors to the Burton plan.

He said the police and the county council are very supportive of the restriction although the police say it will have a very low level of enforcement.

Cllr Colin Jamieson, who is also a Burton parish councillor, said the 20mph scheme came about because of a village conservation area report "which reflected the overwhelming support of the community".

And he pointed out that the police were good at catching speeding motorists.

"If this scheme saves just one person from having an accident, or a fatality, then I feel whatever money is needed will be well spent," he said.

Roads subject to the 20mph limit will be: Avon View Road, Barlands Close, Birch Avenue, Bodowen Road, Bodowen Close, Brinsons Close, Burton Green, Burnham Road, Campbell Road, Chestnut Way, Cowleys Road, Crabtree Close; Farwell Close, Fern Close, Footners Lane, Harrison Close, Heathland Close, Katherine Chance Close, Kirkham Avenue, Martins Hill Close, Moorcroft Avenue, Park Close, Pittmore Road, Priory View Road; Redcliffe Close, Shorts Close, Summerfields Close, Treebys Close, Vinneys Close, Whitehayes Road, Winkton Close and Woodstock Road.


Your Say YourThisisdorset

Carl Barron, Dorset says...
5:15pm Sun 9 Mar 08

Quote>> Cllr Ray Nottage states "I would be delighted if we could extend this to other village areas such as Purewell and Stanpit."

Reply>> Well, why stop there Mr JobsWorth? Why not apply the same speed limit into Brangsgore and Mudeford where roads are used like 'Race Tracks.' Don't forget the Bure Haven area and Highciffe. Well, why not just put a blanket ban of 20mph on the whole of BH23 if you are going to act ridiculous?

Laws don't make people behave just because you say so, this is just another way of collecting added revenue from fines.

rayc, Poole says...
8:23am Mon 10 Mar 08

Quote "If this scheme saves just one person from having an accident, or a fatality, then I feel whatever money is needed will be well spent," he said.

It's amazing how this can apply to speed limits but when it comes to keeping fuel bills down, improving the NHS, keeping council tax reasonable and improving life so that people are not driven to an early grave then it is never a factor.
Perhaps there is a business plan which shows that draconian enforcement of these new limits will make a profit concils nevewr do anything for nothing.

rayc, Poole says...
8:34am Mon 10 Mar 08

quote "And he pointed out that the police were good at catching speeding motorists"

I believe it is Police policy that 20mph limits have to be "self enforcing". Who is going to enforce these new limits?

Isitme, Christchurch says...
10:11pm Mon 10 Mar 08

Why do you need 20mph on cul-de-sac's where it isn't possible to drive fast??

rayc, Poole says...
12:32pm Tue 11 Mar 08

I've got a great idea concerning enforcement. Anybody caught "speeding" at 10% or more iver the limit and is found to live in a postcode covered by the scheme should incur twice the penalty of a non resident.

Hannah, Bournemouth says...
11:45am Thu 13 Mar 08

And were the drivers consulted on this? I think not. Jay walking used to be a crimanal offence. Now the jay walkers rule and the drivers are put in an impossible situation. A 20 mph limit is impractical and will not be observed. And placing obstructions in the road just simply enfuriates the drivers and creates a dangereous situation.

Hannah, Bournemouth says...
11:48am Thu 13 Mar 08

And before anyone comments on my spelling/keyboard typing...

And were the drivers consulted on this? I think not. Jay walking used to be a criminal offence. Now the jay walkers rule and the drivers are put in an impossible situation. A 20 mph limit is impractical and will not be observed. And placing obstructions in the road just simply infuriates the drivers and creates a dangerous situation.


Comments are closed on this article.

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »