News RSS Feed


Young drivers ‘need more experience' says police sergeant

7:00pm Thursday 27th December 2007

comment Comments (6)   Have your say »


A DORSET traffic officer has backed plans to extend the driving test, effectively increasing the driving age to 18.

According to reports, the government is considering expanding the test meaning learner drivers, who can still get a provisional licence at 17, will have to spend more time with a qualified instructor before they are able to take the practical test.

Instructors will tick off required key driving skills, including night driving and driving on high speed roads, which could mean learner drivers spend up to 500 hours behind the wheel before taking their test.

Experienced road traffic policeman at Ferndown road policing unit Sgt Steve Quill believes increasing the time young drivers spend with an instructor would make the roads safer.

He said: "Anything that educates people from the start of their driving career, making them aware of the safety issues of driving on today's busy roads, has got to be a good thing.

"Driving instruction over a longer period of time increases the likelihood that the learner driver will meet different driving conditions which with the benefit of instruction at the time those different conditions arose, should make them a better driver in the long term.

"At the moment if you pass the theory test and pick up the practical side of driving quickly you could have six lessons and then put in for a test and pass."

There are plans to make the practical test more stringent including driving on a dual carriageway and turning right at a busy junction.

Hopefully more driving experience would mean fewer crashes involving young people.

Road safety figures show one in five new teenage drivers have an accident with in a year of passing their test.

Sgt Quill said that he thought the driving test should evolve to take into account changes in driving conditions, increased traffic and different vehicle handling.

However he added that more instruction will make it more expensive to learn to drive.

He said: "As a father with a daughter who will soon be asking for driving lessons, I would like there to be a fixed fee for getting a driving licence because the prospect of an unknown amount of time with driving instructors at £15 quite daunting. There could also be a reduction in insurance premiums for drivers who have passed the extended test."

He added that this could be an ideal time for the government to consider limiting the engine size of cars newly qualified drivers could use in their first year of driving.

  • THE Daily Echo is launching a campaign on Monday January 7, aimed at helping to cut the number of fatal accidents involving young drivers on our roads.

In a series of news stories, features and interviews we will be highlighting the issues and looking at a range of proposals which could help reduce the tragic toll of death and serious injury.

Please join the debate. you can email your views to newsdesk@bournemouthecho.co.uk


Your Say YourThisisdorset

Ernestine, Bermagui says...
10:59am Fri 28 Dec 07

I find it scary that a driver can hold a licence and still need to know a lot more about driving. "driving on a dual carriageway and turning right at a busy junction, changes in driving conditions, increased traffic and different vehicle handling and limiting the engine size of cars newly qualified drivers could use in their first year of driving."All these things will now be considered -
And about time too!

Ernestine, Bermagui says...
11:01am Fri 28 Dec 07

My husband has just read this article and agrees with all that Sgt Quill says. "But will anyone listen to him" he said rather dourly...

alasdair, windsor/kosovo says...
12:04pm Fri 28 Dec 07

i totally agree with the idea of limiting the engine size to say one litre but i for one believe it should be at least to the age of 21 years old thus giving the driver the chance to build his no claims insurance at the moment there is nothing stopping a 17 year old on a provisional licence driving a super car so why not the same as a motorcycle limit the engine size ?

Nick, Bournemouth says...
4:53pm Fri 28 Dec 07

Forum members have been discussing this for the last 8 months. Once again I ask those who comment on the standards of other drivers to answer the question.. When did you last read the highway code? Everyone makes mistakes, the only difference is that new drivers have not got the experience to react both to their, and others, mistakes.

One thing I would add, please let them have a go at a large vehicle too. It would be nice if all drivers where aware that the lines painted on the road do not apply to large vehicles as they need more room to turn. Some do not even necessarily apply to cars… (Upton Crossroads springs to mind here).

godzilla, hamworthy says...
6:28pm Fri 28 Dec 07

of course ypunger drivers tend to drive much faster but it is not only restricted to youngsters, i would also like to see re-test done on any one over 70 also eye test must be included. Younger drivers should have to show P plates for a year also motorway driving to be included in the lessons.

Michael, Surrey says...
11:42pm Sun 6 Jan 08

I welcome the introduction of a graduated licensing and training system that will save the lives of young drivers and their innocent victims. Far too many young drivers have killed themselves or their friends or families or others through their inexperience, feelings of invincibility or through sheer teenage stupidity on the roads. Too many otherwise decent young people are in prison because of their driving misdemeanours, suffering the life-changing consequences. Anything that will teach the young driver what is at stake when they get behind the wheel of a car is to be welcomed.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »