1:00pm Tuesday 9th October 2007
THE SPECTRE of a 70-foot high chimney on the fringe of Bournemouth Airport belching fumes into the air over the greenbelt has cast a cloud over plans for a wood-fired power station at Hurn.
Eco-composting is seeking approval from Dorset county council for its pioneering scheme to develop a biomass generator on its Parley Lane complex to turn scrap wood into electricity.
The biomass process, already widely used in Europe where wood chippings piling up at Parley are currently being shipped to fire furnaces in Germany, is claimed to minimise emissions by burning wood at ultra-high temperatures and fitting filters in the smoke stack.
But the scheme has ignited local opposition from Hurn parish council concerned at the fall out from the proposed 22-metre high smoke stack and the blot of the landscape it will create.
And tomorrow Christchurch borough council's planning control committee is being recommended by its officers to lodge a formal objection to the biomass scheme when it comes before county planners later in the year.
In his report to the committee planning officer Giles Moir argued the bio energy facility would be harmful to the greenbelt setting and threaten surrounding heathland areas of special scientific interest and the applicants had failed to prove special circumstances to outweigh the harm.
He said proposed landscaping, including willow plantations to provide additional fuel for the facility, would not screen the power station complex, especially the tall chimney which would be highly visible in an area of largely open land.
Mr Moir also questioned claims that biomass burning was the best available technology for dealing with wood waste and raised concerns at the impact of gases including nitrogen compounds being emitted into the air and falling on environmentally sensitive sites.
"While it is acknowledge that measures will be in place to reduce the level of harmful emissions, the environmental statement identifies that these will have very limited impact on the reduction of emissions," he said.
jamie, Winton says...
2:27pm Tue 9 Oct 07
The-bleeding-obvious, Bournemouth says...
2:47pm Tue 9 Oct 07
Ted, Bournemouth says...
2:49pm Tue 9 Oct 07
Ted, Bournemouth says...
3:01pm Tue 9 Oct 07
Badger, Poole says...
3:04pm Tue 9 Oct 07
jamie wrote:Jamie from Winton is right; our supply of non-renewable energy sources is running out. But the alternative doesnt have to be a change of lifestyle at all.
With most non-renewable energy sources becoming more scarce and increasingly expensive, it will not be long before we are running out of alternatives. So its a choice between unsightly chimneys and a bit of CO2 or kissing your current lifestyle of heated homes, tvs and lighting goodbye. In my opinion localised power stations are by far the best alternative and before parish councils object to such plants they need to think about viable alternatives.
knocker, christchurch says...
3:11pm Tue 9 Oct 07
Rory, Wimborne says...
3:46pm Tue 9 Oct 07
Rory, Wimborne says...
3:47pm Tue 9 Oct 07
The-bleeding-obvious, Bournemouth says...
6:04pm Tue 9 Oct 07
Rory wrote:Its about 2500 sq mts per person on the planet (50 x 50 mtrs)!
I aint to good at math so if im wrong sorry but; Earths surface - 510,065,600km2(incl. Water) 3% of Earths Surface is 15,301,968km2, which taking into acount Englands surface area is 130,395km2, that means we would have to cover an area of land, or water, with solar panels 117.350 times the size of England to apparently solve all are energy problems. Would we even have the resources to make such a structure?!!? I'm not quite sure thats a blatently obvious option.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search for Homes
Search Now »
Search for Cars
Search Now »
fedupwithjobsworths, Moordown says...
2:04pm Tue 9 Oct 07
Those who say that this is a carbon neutral eco project because all the CO2 released from burning these chippings were originally in the atmosphere conveniently forget that this is also the case for coal. Like bio fuels and carbon neutral homes (with wood burners) this idea is seriously flawed. CO2 is CO2 whatever the source.