News RSS Feed


Residents vow to fight mast plans for water tower

7:00pm Sunday 26th August 2007

comment Comments (13)   Have your say »


WORRIED Poole residents have pledged to fight plans for a mobile phone mast installation on an unique Victorian water tower.

Operator T-Mobile wants to put up three antennae and other base station equipment on top of the Grade II-listed water tower in Broadstone.

But campaigners say the plans will spoil the character of the historic building and also fear possible health risks to local residents and children at a nearby school.

Eric Hill, who lives on Water Tower Road, said: "While there is no evidence to prove that these installations are dangerous to health in any way, equally there is no evidence to prove they are not."

And he didn't agree with T-Mobile's claims that the mast installation would be more than 250 metres away from nearby Broadstone Middle School, which has 600 pupils.

"I believe it is within 200 metres of the water tower, meaning that hundreds of children will fall within the radiation plume of this installation."

He added: "The timing of this application prevents concerned parents being properly informed of the proposal."

Fellow Water Tower Road resident Duncan Riddell said: "As a Grade II listed building, the beautiful water tower deserves to be protected from the defacement the proposed T-mobile phone masts would cause."

And neighbour Paul Arnold said the tower was an "exceptional example of Victorian architecture".

Mr Arnold, whose house lies within 40 metres of the mast, added that he was also "extremely concerned" about the potential health risks to his family and three young children.

The tower already supports two thin mobile masts and in 1999, operator Orange gained planning and listed building consent to put up six mobile antennae and other equipment, although the company has only so far installed a transmission dish.

A spokesperson for T-Mobile said that though the tower is a listed building, government guidance allows for "very special circumstances" which can outweigh any harm arising from phone masts.

The need to set up a comprehensive telecommunications network amounted to such special circumstances, said the company, and justification for the plans outweighed "any limited harm caused by its visual impact".

T-Mobile said the site was selected to be as far from sensitive sites as possible, while still providing the necessary level of coverage. Fears about possible health hazards arising from telecommunication equipment had not been substantiated, it adds


Your Say YourThisisdorset

Bigtone, Poole says...
9:07am Mon 27 Aug 07

Why are these mobile operators so keen to install masts and equipment to increase coverage?
I would like to ask the operators why they are not investing and increasing the technology of satellite mobile phones?No masts.No eyesores and no possible health risks and of course no "blank"spots in communications.

paul, poole says...
11:13am Mon 27 Aug 07

Sattelites are a good idea but have you seen how many are up there already? These phone companies don't give a **** about our health and as the comment from the story goes..."While there is no evidence to prove that these installations are dangerous to health in any way, equally there is no evidence to prove they are not."
So why is it allowed to continue? I saw one being placed right next to a pavement on the main road @ bear cross. It's getting ridiculous in the extreme.we're all going to die sometime but being microwaved towards death is just not on...funnily enough i don't have a mobile...i did have one until i got fed up trying to have a conversation. I bet you've said...i can't hear you, you're breaking up, i'm going into a tunnel, i'm in a forest and then get cutoff in midflow....they are a waste of your hard earned cash. Handy in some cases yes but more often than not they simply don't work....

Steve, Ensbury Park says...
12:19pm Mon 27 Aug 07

Why don't the campaigners try and stop all motor vehicles within a mile of the school? Surely all those exhaust fumes are bad for the children!!

PokesdownMark, Pokesdown says...
1:43pm Mon 27 Aug 07

There is no evidence that mobile phone radio waves are a health risk. In fact lots of scientific work has concluded there is no risk. So there is actually a lot of evidence that there is NO risk to health.

Phrases like "radiation plume" are false and highly misleading. Pure fear-mongering.


jtdorset81, Bournemouth says...
4:33pm Wed 29 Aug 07

This is a silly one? Do you know how many there are locally anyway? One more would make no difference! That Victorian Water Tower is a mess anyway! Knock it down I say!

Adrian X, Poole says...
5:59pm Wed 29 Aug 07

Bigtone wrote:
Why are these mobile operators so keen to install masts and equipment to increase coverage?
I would like to ask the operators why they are not investing and increasing the technology of satellite mobile phones?No masts.No eyesores and no possible health risks and of course no "blank"spots in communications.
Because the mobile phone operators all already have multi-billion pound debt. Satellites need billions in investment and the future for satellite phones is still bleak after companies like Iridium and ICO went bankrupt in the late 90s. Iridium is operating again now but is used principally by the US government. Calls to Iridium phones cost around £10 per minute, so you can see that cost is a problem.

John E, Bristol says...
9:26am Thu 30 Aug 07

Good old T-Mobile still trying to insist there are no health risks. On the contrary there are over 1000 independent studies, linking phone masts electro magnetic radiation with serious ill health including cancer, confirm that phone masts should not be sited within 350 metres of schools or housing. Numerous studies have proved that melatonin, the cancer fighting hormone, is suppressed by this pulsing radiation. That's why the cancer clusters continue to increase in the vicinity of phone masts. Phone operators dismiss such research, alleging that their own studies suggests no health risk. However only recently the national press revealed that T-Mobile covered up the damaging results of their own research. The Ecolog Institute, a research organisation which examines the health effects of mobile phones, was commissioned by T-Mobile to investigate the possible health risks of mobile phone masts. The 2003 Ecolog report confirmed:

'Given the results of the present epidemiological studies, it can be concluded that electromagnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do play a role in the development of cancer. This is particularly notable for tumours of the central nervous system.'


So T-Mobile insist that cancer is not a health hazard. Incredible!

Gordon, Wimborne says...
4:24pm Thu 30 Aug 07

The one sure way to stop the onrush of phone masts is stop using the mobile phone unless it absolutely necessary the only language the phone companies understand is the chink of money in their coffers

Johnny B, Poole says...
6:07pm Sat 1 Sep 07

I assume all those that are concenred about the supposed "health risks" do not own a mobile phone or microwave oven. There is a bigger risk from microwave ovens that can leak microwave radiation then a mobile mast!

Mike Pickering, Bournemouth says...
6:20am Mon 3 Sep 07

If we had a decent satellite based internet wifi set up throughout the borough, then ironically, we could use a prominenT mobile provider's new feature that allows you to make calls from a mobile phone via the internet through a wifi network...

stalinvlad, poole says...
10:19pm Mon 3 Sep 07

The tower has two mast on it already, what is it with these rent-a-gobs? Do you suppose one of the other mobile operators paid them to make a storm in a teacup?

A local resident, Poole says...
11:17pm Mon 3 Sep 07

Johnny B wrote:
I assume all those that are concenred about the supposed "health risks" do not own a mobile phone or microwave oven. There is a bigger risk from microwave ovens that can leak microwave radiation then a mobile mast!
Most the people complaining about the phone mast would be quick enough to complain if they had no signal when using their phone.

I'm assuming Mr Arnold does not have a mobile phone with three young childen, too much risk to their health.

storm, poole says...
11:54pm Wed 5 Sep 07

You couldn't alter the usage of a grade II listed home, if it is listed, then leave it alone! B.T. should take over and provide a total mobile service for the cost of landlines but remain ethical. For all we know it could be satellites causing global warming, reflecting rays from the sun. OK a wild theory.

Comments are closed on this article.

MAST PROPOSAL: Grade II listed Water Tower in Broadstone MAST PROPOSAL: Grade II listed Water Tower in Broadstone

Sponsored Links


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »