7:00pm Sunday 26th August 2007
WORRIED Poole residents have pledged to fight plans for a mobile phone mast installation on an unique Victorian water tower.
Operator T-Mobile wants to put up three antennae and other base station equipment on top of the Grade II-listed water tower in Broadstone.
But campaigners say the plans will spoil the character of the historic building and also fear possible health risks to local residents and children at a nearby school.
Eric Hill, who lives on Water Tower Road, said: "While there is no evidence to prove that these installations are dangerous to health in any way, equally there is no evidence to prove they are not."
And he didn't agree with T-Mobile's claims that the mast installation would be more than 250 metres away from nearby Broadstone Middle School, which has 600 pupils.
"I believe it is within 200 metres of the water tower, meaning that hundreds of children will fall within the radiation plume of this installation."
He added: "The timing of this application prevents concerned parents being properly informed of the proposal."
Fellow Water Tower Road resident Duncan Riddell said: "As a Grade II listed building, the beautiful water tower deserves to be protected from the defacement the proposed T-mobile phone masts would cause."
And neighbour Paul Arnold said the tower was an "exceptional example of Victorian architecture".
Mr Arnold, whose house lies within 40 metres of the mast, added that he was also "extremely concerned" about the potential health risks to his family and three young children.
The tower already supports two thin mobile masts and in 1999, operator Orange gained planning and listed building consent to put up six mobile antennae and other equipment, although the company has only so far installed a transmission dish.
A spokesperson for T-Mobile said that though the tower is a listed building, government guidance allows for "very special circumstances" which can outweigh any harm arising from phone masts.
The need to set up a comprehensive telecommunications network amounted to such special circumstances, said the company, and justification for the plans outweighed "any limited harm caused by its visual impact".
T-Mobile said the site was selected to be as far from sensitive sites as possible, while still providing the necessary level of coverage. Fears about possible health hazards arising from telecommunication equipment had not been substantiated, it adds
paul, poole says...
11:13am Mon 27 Aug 07
Steve, Ensbury Park says...
12:19pm Mon 27 Aug 07
PokesdownMark, Pokesdown says...
1:43pm Mon 27 Aug 07
jtdorset81, Bournemouth says...
4:33pm Wed 29 Aug 07
Adrian X, Poole says...
5:59pm Wed 29 Aug 07
Bigtone wrote:Because the mobile phone operators all already have multi-billion pound debt. Satellites need billions in investment and the future for satellite phones is still bleak after companies like Iridium and ICO went bankrupt in the late 90s. Iridium is operating again now but is used principally by the US government. Calls to Iridium phones cost around £10 per minute, so you can see that cost is a problem.
Why are these mobile operators so keen to install masts and equipment to increase coverage?
I would like to ask the operators why they are not investing and increasing the technology of satellite mobile phones?No masts.No eyesores and no possible health risks and of course no "blank"spots in communications.
John E, Bristol says...
9:26am Thu 30 Aug 07
'Given the results of the present epidemiological studies, it can be concluded that electromagnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do play a role in the development of cancer. This is particularly notable for tumours of the central nervous system.'
Gordon, Wimborne says...
4:24pm Thu 30 Aug 07
Johnny B, Poole says...
6:07pm Sat 1 Sep 07
Mike Pickering, Bournemouth says...
6:20am Mon 3 Sep 07
stalinvlad, poole says...
10:19pm Mon 3 Sep 07
A local resident, Poole says...
11:17pm Mon 3 Sep 07
Johnny B wrote:Most the people complaining about the phone mast would be quick enough to complain if they had no signal when using their phone.
I assume all those that are concenred about the supposed "health risks" do not own a mobile phone or microwave oven. There is a bigger risk from microwave ovens that can leak microwave radiation then a mobile mast!
storm, poole says...
11:54pm Wed 5 Sep 07
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search for Homes
Search Now »
Search for Cars
Search Now »
Bigtone, Poole says...
9:07am Mon 27 Aug 07
I would like to ask the operators why they are not investing and increasing the technology of satellite mobile phones?No masts.No eyesores and no possible health risks and of course no "blank"spots in communications.